Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33504358›Full record

ArticleThe international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity2021

A natural experimental study of improvements along an urban canal: impact on canal usage, physical activity and other wellbeing behaviours.

Jack S Benton, Sarah Cotterill, Jamie Anderson, Vanessa G Macintyre, Matthew Gittins, Matthew Dennis, David P French

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Actual and Virtual Parks Benefit Quality of Life and Physical Activity: A Cluster Trial.Journal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine · 2024
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jack S BentonManchester Centre for Health Psychology, Division of Psychology & Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Coupland 1 Building, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK. jack.benton@postgrad.manchester.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-7129-550X
Sarah CotterillCentre for Biostatistics, Division of Population Health, Health Services Research & Primary Care, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Jamie AndersonUrban Institute, Department of Geography, School of Environment, Education and Development, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Vanessa G MacintyreManchester Centre for Health Psychology, Division of Psychology & Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Coupland 1 Building, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
Matthew GittinsUrban Institute, Department of Geography, School of Environment, Education and Development, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Matthew DennisDepartment of Geography, School of Education, Environment and Development, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
David P FrenchManchester Centre for Health Psychology, Division of Psychology & Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Coupland 1 Building, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.

Funding

Department of Health IS-BRC-1215-20007
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere are few robust natural experimental studies of improving urban green spaces on physical activity and wellbeing. The aim of this controlled natural experimental study was to examine the impact of green space improvements along an urban canal on canal usage, physical activity and two other wellbeing behaviours (social interactions and taking notice of the environment) among adults in Greater Manchester, UK. The intervention included resurfaced footpaths, removal of encroaching vegetation, improved entrances, new benches and signage.

methodsTwo comparison sites were matched to the intervention site using a systematic five-step process, based on eight correlates of physical activity at the neighbourhood (e.g. population density) and site (e.g. lighting) levels. Outcomes were assessed using systematic observations at baseline, and 7, 12 and 24 months post-baseline. The primary outcome was the change in the number of people using the canal path from baseline to 12 months. Other outcomes were changes in physical activity levels (Sedentary, Walking, Vigorous), Connect and Take Notice behaviours. Data were analysed using multilevel mixed-effects negative binomial regression models, comparing outcomes in the intervention group with the matched comparison group, controlling for day, time of day and precipitation. A process evaluation assessed potential displacement of activity from a separate existing canal path using intercept surveys and observations.

resultsThe total number of people observed using the canal path at the intervention site increased more than the comparison group at 12 months post-baseline (IRR 2.10, 95% CI 1.79-2.48); there were similar observed increases at 7 and 24 months post-baseline. There was some evidence that the intervention brought about increases in walking and vigorous physical activity, social interactions, and people taking notice of the environment. The process evaluation suggested that there was some displacement of activity, but the intervention also encouraged existing users to use the canal more often.

conclusionsUrban canals are promising settings for interventions to encourage green space usage and potentially increase physical activity and other wellbeing behaviours. Interventions that improve access to green corridors along canals and provide separate routes for different types of physical activities may be particularly effective and warrant further research. STUDY PROTOCOL: Study protocol published in Open Science Framework in July 2018 before the first follow-up data collection finished ( https://osf.io/zcm7v ). Date of registration: 28 June 2018.

Indexed as

ExerciseUrban PopulationHealth BehaviorHumansParks, RecreationalProspective StudiesResidence CharacteristicsSocial InteractionUnited KingdomWalkingCanalGreen spaceInterventionNatural experimentPhysical activitySystematic observationUrbanWellbeing

Identifiers

PMID33504358
PMCPMC7838466

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.