Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33504328›Full record

ArticleBMC plant biology2021

Comparative transcriptome analysis of genes involved in the drought stress response of two peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) varieties.

Chunji Jiang, Xinlin Li, Jixiang Zou, Jingyao Ren, Chunyi Jin, He Zhang, Haiqiu Yu, Hua Jin

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC plant biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
11.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Integrated Physiological and Transcriptome Analyses of Wild Jujube (International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Identification and Expression Profile ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Chunji Jiang *College of Agriculture, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang, 110000, China.
Xinlin Li *College of Environment and Resources, Dalian Minzu University, Dalian, 116600, China.
Jixiang ZouCollege of Environment and Resources, Dalian Minzu University, Dalian, 116600, China.
Jingyao RenCollege of Agriculture, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang, 110000, China.
Chunyi JinCollege of Environment and Resources, Dalian Minzu University, Dalian, 116600, China.
He ZhangCollege of Agriculture, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang, 110000, China.
Haiqiu YuCollege of Agriculture, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang, 110000, China. yuhaiqiu@syau.edu.cn.
Hua JinCollege of Environment and Resources, Dalian Minzu University, Dalian, 116600, China. jhua@dlnu.edu.cn.
Dalian Minzu University · CNShenyang Agricultural University · CN

Funding

National Key Research and Development Program of China 2018YFD1000906
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe peanut is one of the most important oil crops worldwide. Qualities and yields of peanut can be dramatically diminished by abiotic stresses particularly by drought. Therefore, it would be beneficial to gain a comprehensive understanding on peanut drought-responsive transcriptional regulatory activities, and hopefully to extract critical drought-tolerance-related molecular mechanism from it.

resultsIn this study, two peanut Arachis hypogaea L. varieties, NH5 (tolerant) and FH18 (sensitive), which show significantly differential drought tolerance, were screened from 23 main commercial peanut cultivars and used for physiological characterization and transcriptomic analysis. NH5 leaves showed higher water and GSH contents, faster stomatal closure, and lower relative conductivity (REC) than FH18. Under the time-course of drought-treatments 0 h (CK), 4 h (DT1), 8 h (DT2) and 24 h (DT3), the number of down-regulated differential expressed genes (DEGs) increased with the progression of treatments indicating repressive impacts on transcriptomes by drought in both peanut varieties.

conclusionsNevertheless, NH5 maintained more stable transcriptomic dynamics than FH18. Furthermore, annotations of identified DEGs implicate signal transduction, the elimination of reactive oxygen species, and the maintenance of cell osmotic potential which are key drought-tolerance-related pathways. Finally, evidences from the examination of ABA and SA components suggested that the fast stomatal closure in NH5 was likely mediated through SA rather than ABA signaling. In all, these results have provided us a comprehensive overview of peanut drought-responsive transcriptomic changes, which could serve as solid foundation for further identification of the molecular drought-tolerance mechanism in peanut and other oil crops.

Indexed as

DroughtsGenes, PlantAcclimatizationArachisGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, PlantRNA-SeqStress, PhysiologicalDrought stresspeanut Arachis hypogaea L.PhytohormoneRNA-seq

Identifiers

PMID33504328
PMCPMC7839228
OpenAlexW3113045889

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.