Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33504107›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

The Perception of Patient Safety Strategies by Primary Health Professionals.

Katarzyna Kosiek, Adam Depta, Iwona Staniec, Michel Wensing, Maciej Godycki-Cwirko, Anna Kowalczyk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Katarzyna KosiekFamily Doctors' Clinic, Pomorska 96, 91-402 Lodz, Poland.
Adam DeptaDepartment of Medical Insurance and Health Care Financing, Medical University of Lodz, Lindleya 6, 90-131 Lodz, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-5957-0794
Iwona StaniecDepartment of Management, Lodz University of Technology, Piotrkowska 266, 90-924 Lodz, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-5580-5450
Michel WensingDepartment of General Practice and Health Services Research, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 672, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6569-8137
Maciej Godycki-CwirkoCentre for Family and Community Medicine, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Medical University of Lodz, Kopcinskiego 20, 90-153 Lodz, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-9204-5518
Anna KowalczykCentre for Family and Community Medicine, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Medical University of Lodz, Kopcinskiego 20, 90-153 Lodz, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-7524-2085

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Almost all European citizens rank patient safety as very or fairly important in their country. However, few patient safety initiatives have been undertaken or implemented in Poland. The aim was to identify patient safety strategies perceived as important in Poland and compare them with those identified in an earlier Dutch study. A web-based survey was conducted among primary healthcare providers in Poland. The findings were compared with those obtained from eight other countries. The strategies regarded as most important in Poland included the use of integrated medical records for communication with specialists and others, patient-held medical records, acceptable workload in general practice, and availability of information technology. However, despite being seen as important, these strategies have not been widely implemented in Poland. This is the first study to identify strategies considered by primary care physicians in Poland to be important for improving patient safety. These strategies differed significantly from those indicated in other countries.

Indexed as

Patient SafetyPhysicians, Primary CareHealth PersonnelHumansPerceptionPolandpatient safetyprimary carestandard of care

Identifiers

PMID33504107
PMCPMC7908218

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.