ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2021
Quantitative Evaluation of CFTR Pre-mRNA Splicing Dependent on the (TG)mTn Poly-Variant Tract.
Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative Alignment of CFTR2 and CFTR-France Classifications with a Turkish Cystic Fibrosis Referral Cohort.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Co-segregation of the c.489+3A>G variant with p.Cys1400Ter pathogenic CFTR mutation in Cyprus: prevalence and clinical implications.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2025Article
- Quantitative Evaluation ofGenes · 2023Article
- Correlation between CFTR variants and outcomes of ART in patients with CAVD in Central China.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- CFTR gene variants, air pollution, and childhood asthma in a California Medicaid population.Pediatric pulmonology · 2022Article
- Differential fates of introns in gene expression due to global alternative splicing.Human genetics · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Genetic analysis in cystic fibrosis (CF) is a difficult task. Within the many causes of variability and uncertainty, a major determinant is poor knowledge of the functional effect of most DNA variants of the Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane conductance Regulator (CFTR) gene. In turn, knowledge of the effect of a CFTR variant has dramatic diagnostic, prognostic and, in the era of CF precision medicine, also therapeutic consequences. One of the most challenging CFTR variants is the (TG)mTn haplotype, which has variable functional effect and controversial clinical consequences. The exact quantification of the anomalous splicing of CFTR exon 10 (in the HGVS name; exon 9 in the legacy name) and, consequently, of the residual wild-type functional CFTR mRNA, should be mandatory in clinical assessment of patients with potentially pathological haplotype of this tract. Here, we present a real time-based assay for the quantification of the proportion of exon 10+/exon 10- CFTR mRNA, starting from nasal brushing. Our assay proved rapid, economic and easy to perform. Specific primers used for this assay are either disclosed or commercially available, allowing any laboratory to easily perform it. A simplified analysis of the data is provided, facilitating the interpretation of the results. This method helps to enhance the comprehension of the genotype-phenotype relationship in CF and CFTR-related disorders (CFTR-RD), crucial for the diagnosis, prognosis and personalized therapy of CF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.