Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33503677›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of industrial medicine2021

Participatory survey design of a workforce health needs assessment for correctional supervisors.

Alicia G Dugan, Sara Namazi, Jennifer M Cavallari, Robert D Rinker, Julius C Preston, Vincent L Steele, Martin G Cherniack

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of industrial medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Associations of formal and informal organizational support with employed cancer survivors' intent to stay.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Organizational Factors and Their Impact on Mental Health in Public Safety Organizations.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Evaluation of the HearWell Pilot Program: A ParticipatoryInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Alicia G DuganDivision of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, Connecticut, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5776-2960
Sara NamaziDepartment of Health Sciences, Springfield College, Springfield, Massachusetts, USA.
Jennifer M CavallariDivision of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, Connecticut, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8414-8704
Robert D RinkerCSEA/SEIU Local 2001, Hartford, Connecticut, USA.
Julius C PrestonCSEA/SEIU Local 2001, Hartford, Connecticut, USA.
Vincent L SteeleCSEA/SEIU Local 2001, Hartford, Connecticut, USA.
Martin G CherniackDivision of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, Connecticut, USA.
Connecticut State Department of Education · USUniversity of Connecticut · USSpringfield College · US

Funding

Center for the Promotion of Health in the New England WorkplaceU19OH008857 · OH · UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS LOWELL · PI PUNNETT, LAURA · 2006 to 2020
$20.4M
ACL HHS U19OH008857NIOSH CDC HHS U19 OH008857NIOSH CDC HHS U19OH008857
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe correctional workforce experiences persistent health problems, and interventions designed with worker participation show favorable outcomes. However, participatory intervention research often leaves workers out of the health needs assessment, the basis of interventions subsequently developed. This omission risks failure to detect factors contributing to the health and is less likely to result in primary prevention interventions.

methodsPartnering with a correctional supervisors' union, we followed Schulz and colleagues' community-based participatory research (CBPR) methods for participatory survey design and used Healthy Workplace Participatory Program (HWPP) tools to develop a tailored survey to assess workforce health and contributing factors. Utilizing the HWPP Focus Group Guide, we generated key themes to adapt the HWPP All Employee Survey, a generic workforce health assessment, to become thorough and contextually-relevant for correctional supervisors.

resultsContent analysis of focus group data revealed 12 priority health concerns and contributors, including organizational culture, masculinity, work-family conflict, family support, trauma, positive job aspects, health literacy and efficacy, health/risk behaviors, sleep, obesity, and prioritizing work and income over health. Twenty-six measures were added to the generic survey, mainly health-related antecedents including knowledge, attitudes, norms, and motivation.

conclusionFindings yielded new insights about supervisors' lived experiences of work and health, and resulted in a customized workforce survey. CBPR methods and HWPP tools allowed us to identify health issues that we would not have detected with conventional methods, and provide opportunities for interventions that address root causes of poor health. We share challenges faced and lessons learned using CBPR with the correctional workforce.

Indexed as

Needs AssessmentOccupational HealthAdultCommunity-Based Participatory ResearchCorrectional FacilitiesFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchResearch DesignWorkplacecommunity based participatory researchcorrectional supervisorshealthy workplace participatory programsurvey designworkforce health assessment

Identifiers

PMID33503677
PMCPMC9246321
OpenAlexW3124416350

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.