Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33503628›Full record

ArticlePublic health genomics2021

Teenagers and Precision Psychiatry: A Window of Opportunity.

Maya Sabatello, Ying Chen, Carmen Fiorella Herrera, Erika Brockhoff, Jehannine Austin, Paul S Appelbaum

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Public health genomics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. How do experts in psychiatric genetics view the clinical utility of polygenic risk scores for schizophrenia?American journal of medical genetics. Part B, Neuropsychiatric genetics : the official publication of the International Society of Psychiatric Genetics
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Maya SabatelloDepartment of Medicine, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA, ms4075@columbia.edu.
Ying ChenNew York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, New York, USA.
Carmen Fiorella HerreraYale New Haven Health - Bridgeport Hospital, Bridgeport, Connecticut, USA.
Erika BrockhoffMount Sinai West, New York, New York, USA.
Jehannine AustinDepartment of Psychiatry and Medical genetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Paul S AppelbaumDepartment of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.

Funding

Center for Research on Ethical, Legal & Social Implications of Psychiatric, Neurologic & Behavioral GeneticsRM1HG007257 · NHGRI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI APPELBAUM, PAUL STUART · 2018 to 2021
$4.4M
Impact of Psychiatric Genetic Data on Civil Litigation and its Relationship with StigmaK01HG008653 · NHGRI · NEW YORK STATE PSYCHIATRIC INSTITUTE DBA RESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR MENTAL HYGIENE, INC · PI SABATELLO, MAYA · 2015 to 2019
$871k
NHGRI NIH HHS K01 HG008653NHGRI NIH HHS RM1 HG007257
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivePrecision medicine raises hope for translating genetic-based knowledge about psychiatric risks into mental health benefits by motivating health-related, risk-reducing behaviors. Teenagers (ages 14-17) are an important age-group to engage in preventive efforts but, their views about psychiatric genetics are understudied.

methodAn online survey with a nationally representative sample of teenagers (n = 417) was conducted. Participants were randomly assigned to receive 1 of 2 handouts, 1 emphasizing the genetic underpinnings of psychiatric conditions; the other agency-oriented and focusing on gene-environment interactions. Survey questions queried their views about behavioral changes in response to psychiatric genetic risk information and expressed willingness to undertake them. Participants' decision-making characteristics (i.e., self-efficacy, empowerment, intolerance of uncertainty, and sensation-seeking) were assessed at baseline.

resultsTeenagers strongly valued the information provided and its potential usefulness for their mental health. Information about psychiatric genetics alone impacted views about the causes of mental illness. Contrary to our hypothesis, the type of handout did not impact participants' expressed willingness to make behavioral changes to reduce their risk of developing a psychiatric condition, but their sense of empowerment played a key role in their responses.

conclusionEducating teenagers about gene-environment interactions may help facilitate the translational efforts of precision psychiatry. Research with teenagers across racial/ethnic groups, especially those with family histories, is needed to better understand the factors that impact teenagers' empowerment in psychiatric genomic settings and to identify measures, including the best enablers of empowerment (e.g., educators, parents), which would allow them to reap the benefits of precision psychiatry.

Indexed as

Mental HealthPatient Education as TopicPrecision MedicinePsychiatryAdolescentAdolescent HealthDecision MakingEmpowermentFemaleHumansMaleMental DisordersRisk FactorsRisk Reduction BehaviorRisk-TakingSurveys and QuestionnairesAdolescentsEmpowermentGene-environment interactionsPrecision psychiatry

Identifiers

PMID33503628
PMCPMC7920903

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.