Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33503326›Full record

ReviewJournal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution2022

The developmental hourglass model and recapitulation: An attempt to integrate the two models.

Masahiro Uesaka, Shigeru Kuratani, Naoki Irie

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. The Interplay of Ontogeny and Phylogeny at the Transcriptome Level of the Tetrapod Heart.Journal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Evolutionary reversion in tumorigenesis.Frontiers in oncology · 2023
    Review
  11. The developmental hourglass model and recapitulation: An attempt to integrate the two models.Journal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Masahiro UesakaLaboratory for Evolutionary Morphology, RIKEN Center for Biosystems Dynamics Research, Kobe, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-2927-4860
Shigeru KurataniLaboratory for Evolutionary Morphology, RIKEN Center for Biosystems Dynamics Research, Kobe, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-9717-7221
Naoki IrieDepartment of Biological Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-6720-381X
Pioneer (United States) · USRIKEN Center for Biosystems Dynamics Research · JPThe University of Tokyo · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recapitulation is a hypothetical concept that assumes embryogenesis of an animal parallels its own phylogenetic history, sequentially developing from more ancestral features to more derived ones. This concept predicts that the earliest developmental stage of various animals should represent the most evolutionarily conserved patterns. Recent transcriptome-based studies, on the other hand, have reported that mid-embryonic, organogenetic periods show the highest level of conservation (the developmental hourglass model). This, however, does not rule out the possibility that recapitulation would still be detected after the mid-embryonic period. In accordance with this, recapitulation-like morphological features are enriched in late developmental stages. Moreover, our recent chromatin accessibility-based study provided molecular evidence for recapitulation in the mid-to-late embryogenesis of vertebrates, as newly evolved gene regulatory elements tended to be activated at late embryonic stages. In this review, we revisit the recapitulation hypothesis, together with recent molecular-based studies that support the developmental hourglass model. We contend that the recapitulation hypothesis does not entirely contradict the developmental hourglass model and that these two may even coexist in later embryonic stages of vertebrates. Finally, we review possible mechanisms underlying the recapitulation pattern of chromatin accessibility together with the hourglass-like evolutionary conservation in vertebrate embryogenesis.

Indexed as

Embryonic DevelopmentGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalAnimalsBiological EvolutionPhylogenyTranscriptomechromatin accessibilitydevelopmental hourglass modelevo-devogene expression regulationparallelismrecapitulation

Identifiers

PMID33503326
PMCPMC9292893
OpenAlexW3124204861

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.