Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33503188›Full record

ArticleClinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil)2021

Polymerase chain reaction targeting 16S ribosomal RNA for the diagnosis of bacterial meningitis after neurosurgery.

Lauro Vieira Perdigão Neto, Micheli Medeiros, Suzete Cleusa Ferreira, Anna Shoko Nishiya, Denise Brandão de Assis, Ícaro Boszczowski, Silvia Figueiredo Costa, Anna S Levin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Non-Clinical microbiology reviews · 2024
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lauro Vieira Perdigão NetoFaculdade de Medicina (FMUSP), Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, BR.ORCID 0000-0002-7681-8090
Micheli MedeirosFaculdade de Medicina (FMUSP), Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, BR.ORCID 0000-0001-6870-8898
Suzete Cleusa FerreiraDepartamento de Biologia Molecular, Fundacao Pro-Sangue / Hemocentro de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, BR.ORCID 0000-0002-4190-0238
Anna Shoko NishiyaDepartamento de Biologia Molecular, Fundacao Pro-Sangue / Hemocentro de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, BR.ORCID 0000-0002-0623-1999
Denise Brandão de AssisDepartamento de Controle de Infeccao, Hospital das Clinicas (HCFMUSP), Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, SP, BR.ORCID 0000-0002-8758-5472
Ícaro BoszczowskiDepartamento de Controle de Infeccao, Hospital das Clinicas (HCFMUSP), Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, SP, BR.ORCID 0000-0002-0221-3814
Silvia Figueiredo CostaFaculdade de Medicina (FMUSP), Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, BR.ORCID 0000-0003-1087-752X
Anna S LevinFaculdade de Medicina (FMUSP), Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, BR.ORCID 0000-0003-2427-8368
Brazilian Medical Association · BRHospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesBacterial and aseptic meningitis after neurosurgery can present similar clinical signs and symptoms. The aims of this study were to develop and test a molecular method to diagnose bacterial meningitis (BM) after neurosurgery.

methodsA 16S ribosomal RNA gene PCR-based strategy was developed using artificially inoculated cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) followed by sequencing. The method was tested using CSF samples from 43 patients who had undergone neurosurgery and were suspected to suffer from meningitis, and from 8 patients without neurosurgery or meningitis. Patients were classified into five groups, confirmed BM, probable BM, possible BM, unlikely BM, and no meningitis.

resultsAmong the samples from the 51 patients, 21 samples (41%) were culture-negative and PCR-positive. Of these, 3 (14%) were probable BM, 4 (19%) were possible BM, 13 (62%) were unlikely BM, and 1 (5%) was meningitis negative. Enterobacterales, non-fermenters (Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii), Staphylococcus haemolyticus, Granulicatella, Variovorax, and Enterococcus cecorum could be identified. In the group of patients with meningitis, a good agreement (3 of 4) was observed with the results of cultures, including the identification of species.

conclusionMolecular methods may complement the diagnosis, guide treatment, and identify non-cultivable microorganisms. We suggest the association of methods for suspected cases of BM after neurosurgery, especially for instances in which the culture is negative.

Indexed as

Meningitis, BacterialNeurosurgeryEnterococcusHumansPolymerase Chain ReactionRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSensitivity and SpecificityRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID33503188
PMCPMC7811837
OpenAlexW3123442350

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.