Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33503156›Full record

ArticleBrazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologica2021

Racial inequality in perinatal outcomes in two Brazilian birth cohorts.

J M Fonseca, A A M Silva, P R H Rocha, R L F Batista, E B A F Thomaz, F Lamy-Filho, M A Barbieri, H Bettiol

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologica, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Being born and growing up in the Ribeirão Preto and São Luís cohorts.Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologica · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

J M FonsecaDepartamento de Saúde Pública, Universidade Federal do Maranhão, São Luís, MA, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8756-0013
A A M SilvaDepartamento de Saúde Pública, Universidade Federal do Maranhão, São Luís, MA, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4968-5138
P R H RochaDepartamento de Pediatria e Puericultura, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4238-9603
R L F BatistaDepartamento de Saúde Pública, Universidade Federal do Maranhão, São Luís, MA, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1529-0165
E B A F ThomazDepartamento de Saúde Pública, Universidade Federal do Maranhão, São Luís, MA, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4156-4067
F Lamy-FilhoDepartamento de Saúde Pública, Universidade Federal do Maranhão, São Luís, MA, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7858-4195
M A BarbieriDepartamento de Pediatria e Puericultura, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8060-1428
H BettiolDepartamento de Pediatria e Puericultura, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8744-4373
Universidade Federal do Maranhão · BRUniversidade de Ribeirão Preto · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to estimate and compare racial inequality in low birth weight (LBW), preterm birth (PTB), and intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) in two Brazilian birth cohorts. This was a cross-sectional study nested within two birth cohorts in Ribeirão Preto (RP) and São Luís (SL), whose mothers were interviewed from January to December 2010. In all, 7430 (RP) and 4995 (SL) mothers were interviewed. The maternal skin color was the exposure variable. Associations were adjusted for socioeconomic and biological covariates: maternal education, per capita family income, family economic classification, household head occupation, maternal age, parity, marital status, prenatal care, type of delivery, maternal pre-pregnancy BMI, hypertension, hypertension during pregnancy, and smoking during pregnancy collected from questionnaires applied at birth. Statistical analysis was done with the chi-squared test and logistic regression. In RP, newborns from mothers with black skin color had a higher risk of LBW and IUGR, even after adjusting for socioeconomic and biological variables (P<0.001). In SL, skin color was not a risk factor for LBW (P=0.859), PTB (P=0.220), and IUGR (P=0.062), before or after adjustment for socioeconomic and biological variables. The detection of racial inequality in these perinatal outcomes only in the RP cohort after adjustment for socioeconomic and biological factors may be reflecting the existence of racial discrimination in the RP society. In contrast, the greater miscegenation present in São Luís may be reflecting less racial discrimination of black and brown women in this city.

Indexed as

Health Status DisparitiesInfant, Low Birth WeightRacial GroupsSocioeconomic FactorsBrazilCesarean SectionCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornPregnancyPremature BirthRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID33503156
PMCPMC7822460
OpenAlexW3122786012

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.