Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33503110›Full record

ArticleArquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery2021

EFFECT OF SUPPLEMENTATION WITH PROBIOTICS ON COLONIC ANASTOMOSES IN RATS: MORPHOLOGICAL AND TENSIOMETRIC STUDY.

Tiago Jacometo Coelho de Castilho, Gustavo Henrique Doná Rodrigues de Almeida, Eneri Vieira de S L Mello, Antônio Carlos L Campos

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. CAN SUCRALFATE ENEMA PREVENT COLITIS IN COLONIC SEGMENTS WITHOUT FECAL TRANSIT?Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery · 2022
    Article
  4. EXPRESSION OF E-CADHERIN AND CLAUDIN-3 IN THE COLONIC EPITHELIUM AFTER THE INFLIXIMAB THERAPY: EXPERIMENTAL MODEL OF DISUSE COLITIS.Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery · 2022
    Article
  5. DIFFERENT SURGICAL METHODS IN COLON ANASTOMOSIS: EXPERIMENTAL STUDY.Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tiago Jacometo Coelho de CastilhoPostgraduate Program in Surgical Clinic, Health Sciences Sector, Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba, PR, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9332-4933
Gustavo Henrique Doná Rodrigues de AlmeidaAnimal Histotechnical Laboratory, Department of Morphophysiological Sciences, State University of Maringá, Maringá, PR, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2640-8250
Eneri Vieira de S L MelloAnimal Histotechnical Laboratory, Department of Morphophysiological Sciences, State University of Maringá, Maringá, PR, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2358-7230
Antônio Carlos L CamposPostgraduate Program in Surgical Clinic, Health Sciences Sector, Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba, PR, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5080-8380
Universidade Estadual de Maringá · BRUniversidade Federal do Paraná · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe use of probiotics positively modifies the composition and function of intestinal flora, improving the quality of intestinal anastomosis.

aimTo evaluate the impact of probiotic use on intestinal anastomosis of rats.

methodThirty-six adult male Wistar rats (Rattus norvegicus albinus, Rodentia Mammalia) were used, with body weight ranging from 220-320 g. The animals were housed and acclimated individually in boxes receiving water and ration ad libitum. After initial acclimatization, the control group received perioperative ration ad libitum for 12 days (seven preoperatively and five postoperatively) associated with the maltodextrin formula at a dose of 250 mg/day in isocaloric and isovolumetric form. Likewise, the probiotic group received oral supplementation of probiotics dose of 250 mg/day, associated with isocaloric and isovolumetric diet. The probiotic chosen for this study was composed of strains (doses 1x109 CFU/g)12 Lactobacillus paracasei LPC-37, Bifidobacterium lactis HN0019, Lactobacillus rhamnosus HN001 and Lactobacillus acidophilus NCFM. Probiotics or placebo were administered orally with the aid of a dosimeter spatula. Both groups underwent two colostomies, one in the right colon and the second in rectosigmoid, followed by reanastomosis with eight separate 6-0 mononylon stitches. The sacrifice took place on the fifth day. The parameters evaluated included tensile strength, histology and collagen densitometry.

resultsThe rate of intestinal fistula for the control and probiotic groups were, respectively, 22.22% and 11.11% (p=0.6581).Perioperative supplementation with probiotics increased collagen deposition of types I and III (p<0.0001), improved maximum traction force and maximum rupture force, p=0.0250 and p=0.0116 respectively, fibrosis area (p<0.0001), and area of the inflammatory infiltrate (p=0.0115).

conclusionsThe use of probiotics had a positive impact on the quality of intestinal anastomosis.

Indexed as

Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosusProbioticsAnimalsIntestinesLactobacillus acidophilusMaleRatsRats, WistarWound Healing

Identifiers

PMID33503110
PMCPMC7836079
OpenAlexW3122596412

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.