Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33503049›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Pandemic buying: Testing a psychological model of over-purchasing and panic buying using data from the United Kingdom and the Republic of Ireland during the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Richard P Bentall, Alex Lloyd, Kate Bennett, Ryan McKay, Liam Mason, Jamie Murphy, Orla McBride, Todd K Hartman, Jilly Gibson-Miller, Liat Levita and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Concern About COVID-19 Mediates the Relationship Between Life-History Strategy and Stockpiling Food.International journal of psychology : Journal international de psychologie · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Drivers of medical spending behaviour amid the COVID-19 pandemic: Heuristic or systematic.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Richard P BentallUniversity of Sheffield, Sheffield, England.ORCID 0000-0001-7561-2923
Alex LloydRoyal Holloway, University of London, Egham, England.ORCID 0000-0003-0627-0952
Kate BennettUniversity of Liverpool, Liverpool, England.ORCID 0000-0003-3164-6894
Ryan McKayRoyal Holloway, University of London, Egham, England.ORCID 0000-0001-7781-1539
Liam MasonUniversity College London, London, England.
Jamie MurphyUlster University, Coleraine, Northern Ireland.
Orla McBrideUlster University, Coleraine, Northern Ireland.
Todd K HartmanUniversity of Sheffield, Sheffield, England.
Jilly Gibson-MillerUniversity of Sheffield, Sheffield, England.
Liat LevitaUniversity of Sheffield, Sheffield, England.
Anton P MartinezUniversity of Sheffield, Sheffield, England.
Thomas V A StocksUniversity of Sheffield, Sheffield, England.
Sarah ButterUniversity of Sheffield, Sheffield, England.
Frédérique VallièresTrinity College Dublin, Dublin, Republic of Ireland.
Philip HylandMaynooth University, Maynooth, Republic of Ireland.
Thanos KaratziasEdinburgh Napier University, Edinburgh, Scotland.
Mark ShevlinUlster University, Coleraine, Northern Ireland.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/S006613/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The over-purchasing and hoarding of necessities is a common response to crises, especially in developed economies where there is normally an expectation of plentiful supply. This behaviour was observed internationally during the early stages of the Covid-19 pandemic. In the absence of actual scarcity, this behaviour can be described as 'panic buying' and can lead to temporary shortages. However, there have been few psychological studies of this phenomenon. Here we propose a psychological model of over-purchasing informed by animal foraging theory and make predictions about variables that predict over-purchasing by either exacerbating or mitigating the anticipation of future scarcity. These variables include additional scarcity cues (e.g. loss of income), distress (e.g. depression), psychological factors that draw attention to these cues (e.g. neuroticism) or to reassuring messages (eg. analytical reasoning) or which facilitate over-purchasing (e.g. income). We tested our model in parallel nationally representative internet surveys of the adult general population conducted in the United Kingdom (UK: N = 2025) and the Republic of Ireland (RoI: N = 1041) 52 and 31 days after the first confirmed cases of COVID-19 were detected in the UK and RoI, respectively. About three quarters of participants reported minimal over-purchasing. There was more over-purchasing in RoI vs UK and in urban vs rural areas. When over-purchasing occurred, in both countries it was observed across a wide range of product categories and was accounted for by a single latent factor. It was positively predicted by household income, the presence of children at home, psychological distress (depression, death anxiety), threat sensitivity (right wing authoritarianism) and mistrust of others (paranoia). Analytic reasoning ability had an inhibitory effect. Predictor variables accounted for 36% and 34% of the variance in over-purchasing in the UK and RoI respectively. With some caveats, the data supported our model and points to strategies to mitigate over-purchasing in future crises.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAnxietyConsumer BehaviorCOVID-19DepressionFemaleHoardingHumansIrelandMaleMiddle AgedModels, PsychologicalPandemicsPanicSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID33503049
PMCPMC7840055

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.