ArticlePloS one2021
Pandemic buying: Testing a psychological model of over-purchasing and panic buying using data from the United Kingdom and the Republic of Ireland during the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Death Anxiety Associated With Coronavirus (COVID-19) Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Omega · 2024Pooled it
- Reducing Panic Buying During Crisis Lockdowns: A Randomized Controlled Trial of a Theory-Based Online Intervention.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Concern About COVID-19 Mediates the Relationship Between Life-History Strategy and Stockpiling Food.International journal of psychology : Journal international de psychologie · 2025Article
- The portrayal of panic-buying and stockpiling in English newspapers during Covid, a mixed-method content analysis.PloS one · 2025Article
- Review on Panic Buying Behavior during Pandemics: Influencing Factors, Stockpiling, and Intervention Strategies.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Can major public health emergencies increase the participation of commercial insurance? Evidence from China.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- Online rumors during the COVID-19 pandemic: co-evolution of themes and emotions.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- Is it time to stock up? Understanding panic buying during the COVID-19 pandemic.Australian journal of psychology · 2023Article
- The impact of paid social Q&A on panic buying and digital hoarding at the stage of coexistence with COVID-19: The moderating role of sensitivity to pain of payment.International journal of disaster risk reduction : IJDRR · 2023Article
- Article
- Defining collective irrationality of COVID-19: shared mentality, mimicry, affective contagion, and psychosocial adaptivity.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Review
- Fake news on Facebook and their impact on supply chain disruption during COVID-19.Annals of operations research · 2022Article
- The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Food Security of UK Adults Aged 20-65 Years (COVID-19 Food Security and Dietary Assessment Study).Nutrients · 2022Article
- Measuring a panic buying behavior: the role of awareness, demographic factors, development, and verification.Heliyon · 2022Article
- Fear of COVID-19 and Perceived Stress: The Mediating Roles of Neuroticism and Perceived Social Support.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Individual and group level risk factors in preventive health and panic buying behaviors during COVID-19 pandemic in India.Current psychology (New Brunswick, N.J.) · 2022Article
- Drivers of medical spending behaviour amid the COVID-19 pandemic: Heuristic or systematic.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2022Article
- A Qualitative Study Exploring Management of Food Intake in the United Kingdom During the Coronavirus Pandemic.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- Is it really "panic buying"? Public perceptions and experiences of extra buying at the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic.PloS one · 2022Article
- Chinese public's panic buying at the beginning of COVID-19 outbreak: The contribution of perceived risk, social media use, and connection with close others.Current psychology (New Brunswick, N.J.) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The over-purchasing and hoarding of necessities is a common response to crises, especially in developed economies where there is normally an expectation of plentiful supply. This behaviour was observed internationally during the early stages of the Covid-19 pandemic. In the absence of actual scarcity, this behaviour can be described as 'panic buying' and can lead to temporary shortages. However, there have been few psychological studies of this phenomenon. Here we propose a psychological model of over-purchasing informed by animal foraging theory and make predictions about variables that predict over-purchasing by either exacerbating or mitigating the anticipation of future scarcity. These variables include additional scarcity cues (e.g. loss of income), distress (e.g. depression), psychological factors that draw attention to these cues (e.g. neuroticism) or to reassuring messages (eg. analytical reasoning) or which facilitate over-purchasing (e.g. income). We tested our model in parallel nationally representative internet surveys of the adult general population conducted in the United Kingdom (UK: N = 2025) and the Republic of Ireland (RoI: N = 1041) 52 and 31 days after the first confirmed cases of COVID-19 were detected in the UK and RoI, respectively. About three quarters of participants reported minimal over-purchasing. There was more over-purchasing in RoI vs UK and in urban vs rural areas. When over-purchasing occurred, in both countries it was observed across a wide range of product categories and was accounted for by a single latent factor. It was positively predicted by household income, the presence of children at home, psychological distress (depression, death anxiety), threat sensitivity (right wing authoritarianism) and mistrust of others (paranoia). Analytic reasoning ability had an inhibitory effect. Predictor variables accounted for 36% and 34% of the variance in over-purchasing in the UK and RoI respectively. With some caveats, the data supported our model and points to strategies to mitigate over-purchasing in future crises.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.