Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33503001›Full record

ReviewJMIR public health and surveillance2021

Collaborating in the Time of COVID-19: The Scope and Scale of Innovative Responses to a Global Pandemic.

Theresa Bernardo, Kurtis Edward Sobkowich, Russell Othmer Forrest, Luke Silva Stewart, Marcelo D'Agostino, Enrique Perez Gutierrez, Daniel Gillis

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in JMIR public health and surveillance, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Theresa Bernardo *Department of Population Medicine, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1330-3284
Kurtis Edward Sobkowich *Department of Population Medicine, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5702-9427
Russell Othmer ForrestDepartment of Population Medicine, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1875-388X
Luke Silva Stewart *Department of Population Medicine, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-4344-7975
Marcelo D'Agostino *Information Systems for Health, Evidence and Intelligence for Action in Health, Pan American Health Organization and World Health Organization Regional Office for the Americas, Washington, DC, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-6083-7713
Enrique Perez Gutierrez *Health Information and Risk Assessment Unit, Pan American Health Organization and World Health Organization Regional Office for the Americas, Washington, DC, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-7730-899X
Daniel Gillis *School of Computer Science, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7646-259X

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The emergence of COVID-19 spurred the formation of myriad teams to tackle every conceivable aspect of the virus and thwart its spread. Enabled by global digital connectedness, collaboration has become a constant theme throughout the pandemic, resulting in the expedition of the scientific process (including vaccine development), rapid consolidation of global outbreak data and statistics, and experimentation with novel partnerships. To document the evolution of these collaborative efforts, the authors collected illustrative examples as the pandemic unfolded, supplemented with publications from the JMIR COVID-19 Special Issue. Over 60 projects rooted in collaboration are categorized into five main themes: knowledge dissemination, data propagation, crowdsourcing, artificial intelligence, and hardware design and development. They highlight the numerous ways that citizens, industry professionals, researchers, and academics have come together worldwide to consolidate information and produce products to combat the COVID-19 pandemic. Initially, researchers and citizen scientists scrambled to access quality data within an overwhelming quantity of information. As global curated data sets emerged, derivative works such as visualizations or models were developed that depended on consistent data and would fail when there were unanticipated changes. Crowdsourcing was used to collect and analyze data, aid in contact tracing, and produce personal protective equipment by sharing open designs for 3D printing. An international consortium of entrepreneurs and researchers created a ventilator based on an open-source design. A coalition of nongovernmental organizations and governmental organizations, led by the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy, created a shared open resource of over 200,000 research publications about COVID-19 and subsequently offered cash prizes for the best solutions to 17 key questions involving artificial intelligence. A thread of collaboration weaved throughout the pandemic response, which will shape future efforts. Novel partnerships will cross boundaries to create better processes, products, and solutions to consequential societal challenges.

Indexed as

Cooperative BehaviorDiffusion of InnovationCOVID-19HumansPandemicsAIartificial intelligencebig datacollaborationcommunicationCOVID-19crowdsourcingdisseminationinformation sharinginnovationknowledgepersonal protective equipmentteamwork

Identifiers

PMID33503001
PMCPMC7879722

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.