Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33502820›Full record

ArticleThe journal of pathology. Clinical research2021

Prognostic value of absolute quantification of mutated KRAS in circulating tumour DNA in lung adenocarcinoma patients prior to therapy.

Sissel Gyrid Freim Wahl, Hong Yan Dai, Elisabeth F Emdal, Anine L Ottestad, Vibeke G Dale, Elin Richardsen, Tarje O Halvorsen, Bjørn Henning Grønberg

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of pathology. Clinical research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sissel Gyrid Freim WahlDepartment of Pathology, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.
Hong Yan DaiDepartment of Pathology, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.
Elisabeth F EmdalDepartment of Pathology, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.
Anine L OttestadDepartment of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, NTNU, Norwegian University of Technology and Science, Trondheim, Norway.
Vibeke G DaleDepartment of Pathology, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.
Elin RichardsenDepartment of Medical Biology, UiT, The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
Tarje O HalvorsenDepartment of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, NTNU, Norwegian University of Technology and Science, Trondheim, Norway.
Bjørn Henning GrønbergDepartment of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, NTNU, Norwegian University of Technology and Science, Trondheim, Norway.
St Olav's University Hospital · NONorwegian University of Science and Technology · NOUiT The Arctic University of Norway · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) is a highly sensitive and accurate method for quantification of nucleic acid sequences. We used absolute quantification of mutated v-Ki-ras2 Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homology gene (KRAS) by ddPCR to investigate the prognostic role of mutated KRAS in patients with KRAS-mutated lung adenocarcinomas. Pre-treatment plasma samples from 60 patients with stages I-IV KRAS-mutated lung adenocarcinomas were analysed for KRAS mutations. The associations between survival, detectable KRAS mutations in plasma, and the plasma concentration of mutated KRAS were assessed. Overall, 23 of 60 (38%) patients had detectable KRAS mutation in plasma. The percentage of patients with detectable mutation was 8% in stage I, 30% in stage II, 71% in stage III, and 73% in stage IV. Estimated overall median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 26.2 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 12.5-39.9] and 50.8 months (95% CI 0-107.3), respectively. Patients with detectable mutations in plasma had significantly worse median PFS compared to patients with undetectable mutation (13.1 versus 70.1 months) and shorter median OS (20.7 versus not reached). High circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) concentrations of mutated KRAS were significantly associated with shorter PFS [hazard ratio (HR) 1.008, 95% CI 1.004-1.012] and OS (HR 1.007, 95% CI 1.003-1.011). All associations remained statistically significant in multivariable analyses. In conclusion, ddPCR is an accurate and easily feasible technique for quantification of KRAS mutations in ctDNA. The presence of detectable KRAS mutation in plasma at baseline was associated with worse PFS and OS. High concentration of mutated KRAS in ctDNA was an independent negative prognostic factor for both PFS and OS.

Indexed as

Adenocarcinoma of LungAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungCirculating Tumor DNADNA Mutational AnalysisFemaleHumansLiquid BiopsyLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedPolymerase Chain ReactionPredictive Value of TestsProgression-Free SurvivalBiomarkers, TumorCirculating Tumor DNAKRAS protein, humanProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)ctDNA levelsdroplet digital PCRliquid biopsynon-small cell lung cancerplasma analyses

Identifiers

PMID33502820
PMCPMC8073004
OpenAlexW3123446615

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.