Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33502802›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of medical genetics. Part A2021

Genetic skin disorders: The value of a multidisciplinary clinic.

James Clayton Parker, Sneha Rangu, Katheryn Lynn Grand, Elizabeth Joyce Bhoj, Leslie Castelo-Soccio, Sarah E Sheppard

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of medical genetics. Part A, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Decoding Genetic Disease Through the Skin: Lessons From the UDN.International journal of dermatology · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

James Clayton ParkerUniversity of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Sneha RanguSection of Dermatology, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Katheryn Lynn GrandDivision of Human Genetics, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9411-2913
Elizabeth Joyce BhojUniversity of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5748-3507
Leslie Castelo-SoccioUniversity of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3289-446X
Sarah E SheppardDivision of Human Genetics, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3480-8123
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

Phenotypic Diversity in COVID-19UL1TR001878 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI FITZGERALD, GARRET A · 2016 to 2025
$102.4M
NRSA Training CoreTL1TR001880 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI MEAGHER, EMMA ANNE · 2016 to 2025
$10.0M
National Center for Research Resources and the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health UL1TR001878NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR001880NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001878
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genodermatoses are inherited disorders with skin manifestations and can present with multisystem involvement, resulting in challenges in diagnosis and treatment. To address this, the expertise of dermatology and clinical genetics through a multidisciplinary clinic (Genodermatoses Clinic) were combined. A retrospective cohort study of 45 children seen between March 2018 and February 2019 in the Genodermatoses Clinic at The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia was performed. Patient demographics, referral information, genetic testing modality, diagnoses, and patient satisfaction scores were evaluated to assess the clinic's impact. The majority of patients (42.2%) were referred from Dermatology and 86.7% were referred for diagnosis. Two-thirds of the patients were recommended genetic testing, and subsequently 73.3% completed testing. Nearly three-quarters, 26 out of 36 patients (72.2%), of our undiagnosed patients received a clinical and/or molecular diagnosis, which is imperative in managing their care. Twenty-two individuals pursued genetic testing. In eight individuals (36%), molecular testing was diagnostic. However, in two individuals the molecular diagnosis did not completely explain the phenotype. However, there are still obstacles to genetic testing, such as cost of testing and insurance barriers. Almost all (91.4%) rated the Genodermatoses Clinic as "Very Good," the top Press Ganey score. High patient satisfaction scores suggest a positive impact of the Genodermatoses clinic, emphasizing the importance to increase support for the clinical and administrative time needed for patients with genodermatoses.

Indexed as

Genetic TestingAdolescentAmbulatory Care FacilitiesChildChild, PreschoolFemaleGenetic CounselingGenetic Diseases, InbornGenotypeHumansInfantMalePhenotypeSkin Diseasesgenetic skin disordergenodermatosismultidisciplinary clinic

Identifiers

PMID33502802
PMCPMC8683660
OpenAlexW3125968770

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.