Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33502675›Full record

ArticlePrevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research2021

Agreement Between Self-Reported and Device-Based Sedentary Time among Eight Countries: Findings from the ELANS.

Gerson Ferrari, André O Werneck, Danilo R Silva, Irina Kovalskys, Georgina Gómez, Attilio Rigotti, Lilia Yadira Cortés, Martha Yépez García, María Liria, Marianella Herrera-Cuenca and 11 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Gerson FerrariLaboratorio de Ciencias de la Actividad Física, el Deporte y la Salud, Facultad de Ciencias Médicas, Universidad de Santiago de Chile, USACH, Las Sophoras 175, Estación Central, Santiago, Chile. gerson.demoraes@usach.cl.ORCID 0000-0003-3177-6576
André O WerneckDepartment of Nutrition, School of Public Health, Universidade de São Paulo (USP), São Paulo, Brazil.
Danilo R SilvaDepartment of Physical Education, Federal University of Sergipe - UFS, São Cristóvão, Brazil.
Irina KovalskysCarrera de Nutrición, Facultad de Ciencias Médicas, Pontificia Universidad Católica Argentina, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Georgina GómezDepartamento de Bioquímica, Escuela de Medicina, Universidad de Costa Rica, San José, Costa Rica.
Attilio RigottiCentro de Nutrición Molecular y Enfermedades Crónicas, Departamento de Nutrición, Diabetes y Metabolismo, Escuela de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica, Santiago, Chile.
Lilia Yadira CortésDepartamento de Nutrición y Bioquímica, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá, Colombia.
Martha Yépez GarcíaColégio de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad San Francisco de Quito, Quito, Ecuador.
María LiriaInstituto de Investigación Nutricional, La Molina, Lima, Peru.
Marianella Herrera-CuencaCentro de Estudios del Desarrollo, Universidad Central de Venezuela (CENDES-UCV)/Fundación Bengoa, Caracas, Venezuela.
Ioná Zalcman ZimbergDepartamento de Psicobiologia, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Viviana GuajardoCarrera de Nutrición, Facultad de Ciencias Médicas, Pontificia Universidad Católica Argentina, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Michael PrattInstitute for Public Health, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Carlos Cristi-MonteroIRyS Group, Physical Education School, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso, Valparaíso, Chile.
Adilson MarquesCIPER, Faculty of Human Kinetics, University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal.
Miguel PeraltaCIPER, Faculty of Human Kinetics, University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal.
Cristian Cofre BoladosLaboratorio de Ciencias de la Actividad Física, el Deporte y la Salud, Facultad de Ciencias Médicas, Universidad de Santiago de Chile, USACH, Las Sophoras 175, Estación Central, Santiago, Chile.
Ana Carolina B LemeDepartment of Nutrition, School of Public Health, Universidade de São Paulo (USP), São Paulo, Brazil.
Scott RolloHealthy Active Living and Obesity (HALO) Research Group, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Mauro FisbergInstituto Pensi, Fundação José Luiz Egydio Setubal, Hospital Infantil Sabará, São Paulo, Brazil.
ELANS Study Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to analyze the agreement between self-reported and device-based sedentary time among eight countries in Latin America. As part of the Latin American Study of Nutrition and Health (ELANS), data were collected from 2524 participants (18-65 years) across eight countries. Participants reported time spent sedentary in different activities (computer use at home, videogame use, reading, sitting down to chat with friends/relatives or listening to music, speaking on the phone, watching TV, and riding in a car). Overall sitting time was assessed using a single item from the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ). Device-based sedentary time was assessed using Actigraph GT3X accelerometers. Self-reported overall sitting time (227.1 min/day) produced the lowest values of the three assessment methods, followed by self-reported sum of different types of sedentary behavior (364.1 min/day) and device-based sedentary time (568.6 min/day). Overall, correlation coefficients and ICC varied from weak to moderate (rho: 0.25-0.39; ICC: 0.21:0.39) between self-reported sum of different types of sedentary behavior, self-reported overall sitting time, and device-based sedentary time. The Bland-Altman plots indicated low to moderate agreement between self-reported overall sitting time and device-based sedentary time by sex. Self-report measures underestimate sedentary behavior and overall sitting time when compared with device-based measures. The weak and moderate level of agreement between methods indicates that caution is required when comparing associations between different self-report and device-based measures of sedentary behavior with health outcomes.

Indexed as

AccelerometrySedentary BehaviorExerciseHumansLatin AmericaSelf ReportAccelerometryEpidemiologyQuestionnaireSedentary lifestyle

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.