Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33502654›Full record

ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2021

Echocardiographic screening for mitral valve prolapse in Turkish school children.

Utku Çağlayan, Mehmet Gökhan Ramoğlu, Semra Atalay, Tayfun Uçar, Ercan Tutar

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Utku ÇağlayanDepartment of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Ankara University, Ankara Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Hastanesi, Tıp Fakültesi Caddesi, Cebeci/Çankaya, 06590, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2260-6519
Mehmet Gökhan RamoğluDepartment of Pediatric Cardiology, Ankara University, School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey. mgramoglu@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4117-0685
Semra AtalayDepartment of Pediatric Cardiology, Ankara University, School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4684-7827
Tayfun UçarDepartment of Pediatric Cardiology, Ankara University, School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3386-0691
Ercan TutarDepartment of Pediatric Cardiology, Ankara University, School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0795-0810
Ankara University · TR

Funding

Ankara Universitesi BAP-18L0230002.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We determined the frequency of mitral valve prolapse (MVP) in healthy Turkish school children using the current echocardiographic diagnostic criteria. This epidemiological survey was performed on 2550 school children. All children were screened with echocardiography and the family of children with MVP were also screened. The prolapse of mitral leaflets into left atrium ≥ 2 mm in parasternal long-axis view was used as diagnostic criteria. MVP was classified as classical or non-classical according to anterior mitral leaflet thickness. The thickness of anterior mitral leaflet, the extent of prolapse, and the presence of mitral regurgitation were evaluated. The children were also questioned about the associated symptoms. The prevalence of MVP was 1.25% in children with a mean age of 11.1 ± 2.9 years. The prevalence was 0.9%, 1.2%, and 1.6% in 5-9 years, 10-13 years, and 14-18 years of age, respectively. 43.7% of the cases were classical MVP. The frequency of auscultation findings was 34.3%. 11/34 children had mitral regurgitation. There was no statistically significant difference between classical MVP and non-classical MVP in terms of mitral regurgitation, physical examination findings, and symptoms. Anxiety (37.5%) was the most common symptom. The frequency of MVP in the first-degree relatives of children with MVP was 11/84 (13.1%). Most patients with MVP don't have auscultation findings and symptoms, therefore echocardiography is an important tool in the diagnosis of MVP. It is also reasonable to screen first degree relatives of MVP patients with echocardiography.

Indexed as

Mitral Valve ProlapseChildEchocardiographyHumansInfant, NewbornMitral ValvePredictive Value of TestsSchoolsAuscultationEchocardiographyMitral valve prolapse

Identifiers

PMID33502654
OpenAlexW3124759731

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.