Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33502653›Full record

ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2021

Characteristics of culprit lesion in patients with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction and improvement of diagnostic utility using dual energy cardiac CT.

Hussam Mahmoud Sheta, Sören Möller, Laurits Juhl Heinsen, Koen Nieman, Thomas Thomsen, Kenneth Egstrup, Jess Lambrechtsen

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 48% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Hussam Mahmoud ShetaDepartment of Medical Research, OUH Svendborg Hospital, Institute of Regional Health Research, Valdemarsgade 53, 5700, Svendborg, Denmark. Hussam.sheta@rsyd.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5861-8856
Sören MöllerOPEN-Open Patient data Explorative Network, Odense University Hospital and Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Laurits Juhl HeinsenDepartment of Medical Research, OUH Svendborg Hospital, Institute of Regional Health Research, Valdemarsgade 53, 5700, Svendborg, Denmark.
Koen NiemanDepartments of Cardiovascular Medicine and Radiology, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
Thomas ThomsenDepartment of Medical Research, OUH Svendborg Hospital, Institute of Regional Health Research, Valdemarsgade 53, 5700, Svendborg, Denmark.
Kenneth EgstrupDepartment of Medical Research, OUH Svendborg Hospital, Institute of Regional Health Research, Valdemarsgade 53, 5700, Svendborg, Denmark.
Jess LambrechtsenDepartment of Medical Research, OUH Svendborg Hospital, Institute of Regional Health Research, Valdemarsgade 53, 5700, Svendborg, Denmark.
Svendborg Sygehus · DKStanford University · USUniversity of Southern Denmark · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsThe aim of the study was to identify the characteristics of the culprit lesions compared to non-culprit lesions in patients with non-ST-elevation-myocardial infarction using dual energy computed tomography (DECT). METHODS AND

resultsIn 29 patients, we identified 29 culprit lesions and 227 non-culprit lesions. Quantitative values such as the effective atomic number (effective-Z) and Hounsfield Units (HU) values were measured. Furthermore, all the lesions were characterised using characteristics such as composition (non-calcified, predominantly-non-calcified, predominantly-calcified, or calcified), presence of spotty calcification, remodelling index, and napkin ring sign. The mean effective-Z and HU values were significantly lower in culprit lesions than in non-culprit lesions (8.99 ± 1.21 vs 9.79 ± 1.52; p = 0.0066 and 87.41 ± 84.97 vs. 154.45 ± 176.13; p = 0.0447). The culprit lesions had a higher frequency of non-calcified plaques and predominantly non-calcified plaques, and were with a greater presence of napkin ring signs in comparison with non-culprit lesions. There were no differences in the presence of spotty calcification or remodelling index. By adding effective-Z to plaque characteristics such as non-calcified, positive remodelling, spotty calcification, and napkin rings we observed a significant increased sensitivity of detecting culprit lesions (65.5% vs.44.8%), but no significant changes in area under curve (AUC).

conclusionThe use of DECT adds new information of the plaque composition expressed by the effective-Z, which differs significantly in culprit lesions in comparison with non-culprit lesions. The use of the effective-Z improves the diagnostic sensitivity in detection of culprit lesions.

Indexed as

Coronary Artery DiseaseNon-ST Elevated Myocardial InfarctionPlaque, AtheroscleroticCoronary AngiographyHumansPredictive Value of TestsTomography, X-Ray ComputedCardiac computed tomography angiographyCulprit lesionsThin-cap fibro atheromaVulnerable plaques

Identifiers

PMID33502653
OpenAlexW3125870667

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.