Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33502604›Full record

ReviewCell and tissue research2021

Functional properties of insect olfactory receptors: ionotropic receptors and odorant receptors.

Dieter Wicher, Fabio Miazzi

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cell and tissue research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 103 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
103citing papers in PubMed
17.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

103 citing papers in PubMed, 213 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Molecular bases of insect odorant receptor function: specificity and evolution.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2026
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Silencing Attempts ofInsects · 2026
    Article

43 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dieter WicherDepartment of Evolutionary Neuroethology, Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, Hans-Knoell-Str. 8, 07745, Jena, Germany. dwicher@ice.mpg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6443-3399
Fabio MiazziResearch Group Predators and Toxic Prey, Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, Hans-Knoell-Str. 8, 07745, Jena, Germany.
Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The majority of insect olfactory receptors belong to two distinct protein families, the ionotropic receptors (IRs), which are related to the ionotropic glutamate receptor family, and the odorant receptors (ORs), which evolved from the gustatory receptor family. Both receptor types assemble to heteromeric ligand-gated cation channels composed of odor-specific receptor proteins and co-receptor proteins. We here present in short the current view on evolution, function, and regulation of IRs and ORs. Special attention is given on how their functional properties can meet the environmental and ecological challenges an insect has to face.

Indexed as

AnimalsInsectaOlfactory Receptor NeuronsReceptors, Ionotropic GlutamateReceptors, OdorantReceptors, Ionotropic GlutamateReceptors, OdorantAdaptationInsect olfactionIon channelIonotropic receptorOdorant receptorOlfactory sensory neuronSensitizationSignal transduction

Identifiers

PMID33502604
PMCPMC7873100
OpenAlexW3123622259

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.