Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33502571›Full record

ArticleKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2022

St Georg Sled medial unicompartmental arthroplasty: survivorship analysis and function at 20 years follow up.

Andrew J Porteous, James R A Smith, Rachel Bray, James R Robinson, Paul White, James R D Murray

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Andrew J PorteousAvon Orthopaedic Centre, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, BS10 5NB, UK.
James R A SmithAvon Orthopaedic Centre, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, BS10 5NB, UK. jrasmith@me.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4623-5492
Rachel BrayAvon Orthopaedic Centre, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, BS10 5NB, UK.
James R RobinsonAvon Orthopaedic Centre, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, BS10 5NB, UK.
Paul WhiteUniversity of the West of England, Bristol, BS16 1QL, UK.
James R D MurrayAvon Orthopaedic Centre, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, BS10 5NB, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe peri-operative and short-term benefits of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) are well supported in the literature. However, there remains concern regarding the higher revision rate when compared with total knee replacement. This manuscript reports the functional outcome and survivorship of a large series of fixed bearing, medial unicompartmental replacements (St Georg Sled), with a minimum of 20 years follow-up.

methodsBetween 1974 and 1994, 399 patients (496 knees) underwent a medial fixed-bearing UKA. Prospective data were collected pre-operatively and at regular intervals post-operatively using the Bristol Knee Score (BKS), Oxford Knee (OKS) and Western Ontario MacMaster (WOMAC) scores. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to determine survivorship, with revision or need for revision as end point, and differences assessed using Mantel-Cox log rank test.

resultsFunctional knee scores improved post-operatively, but demonstrated a slight decline from 10 years of follow-up onwards. Survivorship is estimated as 86% at 10 years, 80% at 15 years, and 78% at 20 years. Sixty knees were revised, with progression of disease in another compartment the commonest reason. Eighty eight percent were revised using a primary prosthesis. For patients over the age of 65 years at the time of index procedure, 93% died with a functioning prosthesis in situ.

conclusionMedial UKA demonstrates good long-term function and survivorship, and represents an excellent surgical option for patients aged over 65 years of age, where few patients will require a revision procedure. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, KneeKnee ProsthesisOsteoarthritis, KneeAgedFollow-Up StudiesHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateProspective StudiesReoperationRetrospective StudiesSurvivorshipTreatment OutcomeAll polyethyleneFixed bearingMedialOutcomeSt Georg sledUnicompartmental knee arthroplasty

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.