Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33502243›Full record

ArticleBone & joint research2021

Differences between infected and noninfected synovial fluid.

Pouya Akhbari, Matthew K Jaggard, Claire L Boulangé, Uddhav Vaghela, Gonçalo Graça, Rajarshi Bhattacharya, John C Lindon, Horace R T Williams, Chinmay M Gupte

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bone & joint research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Application ofBone & joint research · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Pouya AkhbariDepartment of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3812-5605
Matthew K JaggardDepartment of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
Claire L BoulangéDepartment of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Uddhav VaghelaDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Gonçalo GraçaDepartment of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0876-3876
Rajarshi BhattacharyaDepartment of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
John C LindonDepartment of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Horace R T WilliamsDepartment of Digestive Diseases, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Chinmay M GupteDepartment of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
Imperial College London · GBImperial College Healthcare NHS Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsThe diagnosis of joint infections is an inexact science using combinations of blood inflammatory markers and microscopy, culture, and sensitivity of synovial fluid (SF). There is potential for small molecule metabolites in infected SF to act as infection markers that could improve accuracy and speed of detection. The objective of this study was to use nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy to identify small molecule differences between infected and noninfected human SF.

methodsIn all, 16 SF samples (eight infected native and prosthetic joints plus eight noninfected joints requiring arthroplasty for end-stage osteoarthritis) were collected from patients. NMR spectroscopy was used to analyze the metabolites present in each sample. Principal component analysis and univariate statistical analysis were undertaken to investigate metabolic differences between the two groups.

resultsA total of 16 metabolites were found in significantly different concentrations between the groups. Three were in higher relative concentrations (lipids, cholesterol, and N-acetylated molecules) and 13 in lower relative concentrations in the infected group (citrate, glycine, glycosaminoglycans, creatinine, histidine, lysine, formate, glucose, proline, valine, dimethylsulfone, mannose, and glutamine).

conclusionMetabolites found in significantly greater concentrations in the infected cohort are markers of inflammation and infection. They play a role in lipid metabolism and the inflammatory response. Those found in significantly reduced concentrations were involved in carbohydrate metabolism, nucleoside metabolism, the glutamate metabolic pathway, increased oxidative stress in the diseased state, and reduced articular cartilage breakdown. This is the first study to demonstrate differences in the metabolic profile of infected and noninfected human SF, using a noninfected matched cohort, and may represent putative biomarkers that form the basis of new diagnostic tests for infected SF. Cite this article:

Indexed as

InfectionMetabolic profilingMetabonomicsNuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopySynovial fluid

Identifiers

PMID33502243
PMCPMC7845460
OpenAlexW3125157080

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.