Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33501900›Full record

ReviewPerspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science2021

Psychological and Behavioral Predictors of Vaccine Efficacy: Considerations for COVID-19.

Annelise A Madison, M Rosie Shrout, Megan E Renna, Janice K Kiecolt-Glaser

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 100 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
100citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

100 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Illness Expectations and Asthma Symptoms: A 6-Month Longitudinal Study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. How does geographical diversity shape vaccine efficacy?Clinical and experimental vaccine research · 2024
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

40 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Annelise A MadisonThe Institute for Behavioral Medicine Research, The Ohio State University College of Medicine.
M Rosie ShroutThe Institute for Behavioral Medicine Research, The Ohio State University College of Medicine.
Megan E RennaThe Institute for Behavioral Medicine Research, The Ohio State University College of Medicine.
Janice K Kiecolt-GlaserThe Institute for Behavioral Medicine Research, The Ohio State University College of Medicine.

Funding

Spousal Dementia Caregivers: Risk for Accelerated AgingR01AG069138 · NIA · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI CHRISTIAN, LISA MICHELLE · 2020 to 2024
$5.4M
Breast Cancer Survivors Cardiovascular Risks: Treatment and Behavioral InfluencesR01CA186720 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI KIECOLT-GLASER, JANICE · 2014 to 2018
$4.6M
Marital quality and longevity: Biobehavioral pathwaysR01AG057032 · NIA · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI KIECOLT-GLASER, JANICE · 2017 to 2021
$3.2M
Aerobic Capacity, Depression, & Inflammatory Responsivity in Cancer SurvivorsR01CA186251 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI KIECOLT-GLASER, JANICE · 2015 to 2019
$3.1M
Training Program For Cancer Prevention and ControlT32CA229114 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Chyke Abadama Doubeni, Peter G. Shields · 2018 to 2026
$2.0M
NRSA Training CoreTL1TR002735 · NCATS · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI BUMGARDNER, GINNY L, KIRSCHNER, LAWRENCE S · 2018 to 2022
$1.3M
NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR002735NCI NIH HHS R01 CA186251NCI NIH HHS R01 CA186720NCI NIH HHS T32 CA229114NIA NIH HHS R01 AG057032NIA NIH HHS R01 AG069138
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccine candidates are being evaluated, with the goal of conferring immunity on the highest percentage of people who receive the vaccine as possible. It is noteworthy that vaccine efficacy depends not only on the vaccine but also on characteristics of the vaccinated. Over the past 30 years, a series of studies has documented the impact of psychological factors on the immune system's vaccine response. Robust evidence has demonstrated that stress, depression, loneliness, and poor health behaviors can impair the immune system's response to vaccines, and this effect may be greatest in vulnerable groups such as the elderly. Psychological factors are also implicated in the prevalence and severity of vaccine-related side effects. These findings have generalized across many vaccine types and therefore may be relevant to the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. In this review, we discuss these psychological and behavioral risk factors for poor vaccine responses, their relevance to the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as targeted psychological and behavioral interventions to boost vaccine efficacy and reduce side effects. Recent data suggest these psychological and behavioral risk factors are highly prevalent during the COVID-19 pandemic, but intervention research suggests that psychological and behavioral interventions can increase vaccine efficacy.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesHumansLife StyleMental DisordersPandemicsRisk FactorsRisk-TakingSARS-CoV-2Treatment OutcomeCOVID-19 VaccinesCOVID-19depressionhealth behaviorsSARS-CoV-2stressvaccine efficacy

Identifiers

PMID33501900
PMCPMC7841255

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.