Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33501635›Full record

ArticleNeotropical entomology2021

Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in Brazil: the Big Outbreak Monitored by Light Traps.

Alexandre Specht, Daniel Ricardo Sosa-Gómez, Danielly Albuquerque Medeiros Rios, Vander Célio Matos Claudino, Silvana Vieira Paula-Moraes, Juaci Vitória Malaquias, Fernando Antônio Macena Silva, Vânia Ferreira Roque-Specht

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neotropical entomology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Frontiers in insect science · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Alexandre SpechtEmbrapa Cerrados, Planaltina, Distrito Federal, Brazil. alexandre.specht@embrapa.br.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8921-0340
Daniel Ricardo Sosa-GómezEmbrapa Soja, Londrina, Paraná, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2633-1644
Danielly Albuquerque Medeiros RiosUniversidade de Brasília, Faculdade UnB Planaltina, Planaltina, Distrito Federal, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4520-7828
Vander Célio Matos ClaudinoUniversidade de Brasília, Faculdade UnB Planaltina, Planaltina, Distrito Federal, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2211-5947
Silvana Vieira Paula-MoraesWest Florida Research and Education Center, University of Florida, Jay, FL, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6888-2300
Juaci Vitória MalaquiasEmbrapa Cerrados, Planaltina, Distrito Federal, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6720-9624
Fernando Antônio Macena SilvaEmbrapa Cerrados, Planaltina, Distrito Federal, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2329-4059
Vânia Ferreira Roque-SpechtUniversidade de Brasília, Faculdade UnB Planaltina, Planaltina, Distrito Federal, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5903-3072

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 305398/2018-0Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 306601/2016-8Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 403376/2013-0Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária SEG MP2 02.13.14.006.00.00
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The first detection of Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in Brazil pointed to a gloomy future for South American agriculture in the 2012/2013 harvest, and insecticide sales increased exponentially during 2013 and 2014. However, after this outbreak, the population of this insect returned to manageable levels. This study documents data on H. armigera moth collection using light traps during the outbreak in two locations: (a) western region of the state of Bahia, including population levels of H. armigera and main noctuid pests during the big outbreak (February and March 2013); (b) Federal District, including monthly data for five growing seasons (July 2012-June 2017). During the outbreak, an average of 527.3 moths were collected per trap (cotton crop, March) in the western region of Bahia each night, while the maximum average in the Federal District was 75.4 moths (January). The number of moths decreased in the following growing seasons, and in October 2016, the maximum number was 2.8 moths per trap. Aspects related to the variations of H. armigera and Helicoverpa zea (Boddie) populations, including the study of phenology and relationship with climatic factors and Oceanic Niño Index, were analyzed and discussed. All aspects are approached to contribute to the management of lepidopteran pests, especially H. armigera, in the productive systems of the Brazilian Cerrado.

Indexed as

AgricultureMothsAnimalsBrazilPest ControlPopulation DensitySeasonsBiological invasionclimatic factorsENSOintegrated pest managementlong time-series studypopulation variations

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.