Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33501561›Full record

ReviewNeurosurgical review2021

Endogenous animal models of intracranial aneurysm development: a review.

Vincent M Tutino, Hamidreza Rajabzadeh-Oghaz, Sricharan S Veeturi, Kerry E Poppenberg, Muhammad Waqas, Max Mandelbaum, Nicholas Liaw, Adnan H Siddiqui, Hui Meng, John Kolega

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neurosurgical review, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. The effect of aspirin on aneurysm wall enhancement: A study in rabbits and humans.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Vincent M TutinoCanon Stroke and Vascular Research Center, University at Buffalo - Clinical and Translational Research Center, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, USA. vincentt@buffalo.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1331-2551
Hamidreza Rajabzadeh-OghazCanon Stroke and Vascular Research Center, University at Buffalo - Clinical and Translational Research Center, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Sricharan S VeeturiCanon Stroke and Vascular Research Center, University at Buffalo - Clinical and Translational Research Center, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Kerry E PoppenbergCanon Stroke and Vascular Research Center, University at Buffalo - Clinical and Translational Research Center, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Muhammad WaqasCanon Stroke and Vascular Research Center, University at Buffalo - Clinical and Translational Research Center, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Max MandelbaumCanon Stroke and Vascular Research Center, University at Buffalo - Clinical and Translational Research Center, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Nicholas LiawCanon Stroke and Vascular Research Center, University at Buffalo - Clinical and Translational Research Center, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Adnan H SiddiquiCanon Stroke and Vascular Research Center, University at Buffalo - Clinical and Translational Research Center, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Hui MengCanon Stroke and Vascular Research Center, University at Buffalo - Clinical and Translational Research Center, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, USA.
John KolegaCanon Stroke and Vascular Research Center, University at Buffalo - Clinical and Translational Research Center, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, USA.
University at Buffalo, State University of New York · US

Funding

Hemodynamic Induction of Pathologic Remodeling Leading to Intracranial AneurysmsR01NS064592 · NINDS · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI MENG, HUI · 2009 to 2013
$1.7M
Virtual Intervention of Intracranial AneurysmsR01NS091075 · NINDS · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI MENG, HUI · 2015 to 2019
$1.7M
Molecular Biomarkers of Dangerous Intracranial AneurysmsR43NS115314 · NINDS · NEUROVASCULAR DIAGNOSTICS, INC. · PI TUTINO, VINCENT MATTHEW · 2019 to 2019
$225k
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS064592NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS091075NINDS NIH HHS R43 NS115314
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The pathogenesis and natural history of intracranial aneurysm (IA) remains poorly understood. To this end, animal models with induced cerebral vessel lesions mimicking human aneurysms have provided the ability to greatly expand our understanding. In this review, we comprehensively searched the published literature to identify studies that endogenously induced IA formation in animals. Studies that constructed aneurysms (i.e., by surgically creating a sac) were excluded. From the eligible studies, we reported information including the animal species, method for aneurysm induction, aneurysm definitions, evaluation methods, aneurysm characteristics, formation rate, rupture rate, and time course. Between 1960 and 2019, 174 articles reported endogenous animal models of IA. The majority used flow modification, hypertension, and vessel wall weakening (i.e., elastase treatment) to induce IAs, primarily in rats and mice. Most studies utilized subjective or qualitative descriptions to define experimental aneurysms and histology to study them. In general, experimental IAs resembled the pathobiology of the human disease in terms of internal elastic lamina loss, medial layer degradation, and inflammatory cell infiltration. After the early 2000s, many endogenous animal models of IA began to incorporate state-of-the-art technology, such as gene expression profiling and 9.4-T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in vivo imaging, to quantitatively analyze the biological mechanisms of IA. Future studies aimed at longitudinally assessing IA pathobiology in models that incorporate aneurysm growth will likely have the largest impact on our understanding of the disease. We believe this will be aided by high-resolution, small animal, survival imaging, in situ live-cell imaging, and next-generation omics technology.

Indexed as

Aneurysm, RupturedHypertensionIntracranial AneurysmAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalHumansMiceRatsAnimal modelCerebral aneurysmIntracranial aneurysmNatural historyReviewVascular disease

Identifiers

PMID33501561
PMCPMC8310898
OpenAlexW3121463256

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.