Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33501424›Full record

ArticleBrain communications2021

Anterior insula and inferior frontal gyrus: where ventral and dorsal visual attention systems meet.

Dario Cazzoli, Brigitte C Kaufmann, Rebecca E Paladini, René M Müri, Tobias Nef, Thomas Nyffeler

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain communications, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Region- and time- specific effects of ketamine on cerebral blood flow: a randomized controlled trial.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2023
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Advances in the Rehabilitation of Hemispatial Inattention.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Dario CazzoliPerception and Eye Movement Laboratory, Department of Biomedical Research (DBMR) and Department of Neurology, University of Bern, and Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland.
Brigitte C KaufmannPerception and Eye Movement Laboratory, Department of Biomedical Research (DBMR) and Department of Neurology, University of Bern, and Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland.
Rebecca E PaladiniPerception and Eye Movement Laboratory, Department of Biomedical Research (DBMR) and Department of Neurology, University of Bern, and Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland.
René M MüriPerception and Eye Movement Laboratory, Department of Biomedical Research (DBMR) and Department of Neurology, University of Bern, and Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland.
Tobias NefARTORG Center for Biomedical Engineering Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Thomas NyffelerPerception and Eye Movement Laboratory, Department of Biomedical Research (DBMR) and Department of Neurology, University of Bern, and Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland.
University of Bern · CHUniversity Hospital of Bern · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The clinical link between spatial and non-spatial attentional aspects in patients with hemispatial neglect is well known; in particular, an increase in alerting can transitorily help to allocate attention towards the contralesional side. In models of attention, this phenomenon is postulated to rely on an interaction between ventral and dorsal cortical networks, subtending non-spatial and spatial attentional aspects, respectively. However, the exact neural underpinnings of the interaction between these two networks are still poorly understood. In the present study, we included 80 right-hemispheric patients with subacute stroke (50% women; age range: 24-96), 33 with and 47 without neglect, as assessed by paper-pencil cancellation tests. The patients performed a computerized task in which they were asked to respond as quickly as possible by button-press to central targets, which were either preceded or not preceded by non-spatial, auditory warning tones. Reaction times in the two different conditions were measured. In neglect patients, a warning tone, enhancing activity within the ventral attentional 'alerting' network, could boost the reaction (in terms of shorter reaction times) of the dorsal attentional network to a visual stimulus up to the level of patients without neglect. Critically, using voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping analyses, we show that this effect significantly depends on the integrity of the right anterior insula and adjacent inferior frontal gyrus, i.e., right-hemispheric patients with lesions involving these areas were significantly less likely to show shorter reaction times when a warning tone was presented prior to visual target appearance. We propose that the right anterior insula and inferior frontal gyrus are a critical hub through which the ventral attentional network can 'alert' and increase the efficiency of the activity of the dorsal attentional network.

Indexed as

alertinginferior frontal gyrus (IFG)insulaneglectwarning tone

Identifiers

PMID33501424
PMCPMC7811755
OpenAlexW3117640419

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.