Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33501384›Full record

ArticleHuman reproduction open2021

A multi-centre, retrospective case series of oocyte cryopreservation in unmarried women diagnosed with haematological malignancies.

K Kato, M Ochi, Y Nakamura, H Kamiya, T Utsunomiya, K Yano, Y Michikura, T Hara, K Kyono, K Takeuchi and 10 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human reproduction open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

K KatoKato Ladies Clinic, Tokyo 160-0023, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-1394-4532
M OchiJapan Association of Private Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinics and Laboratories (Japan A-PART), Tokyo 160-0023, Japan.
Y NakamuraJapan Association of Private Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinics and Laboratories (Japan A-PART), Tokyo 160-0023, Japan.
H KamiyaJapan Association of Private Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinics and Laboratories (Japan A-PART), Tokyo 160-0023, Japan.
T UtsunomiyaJapan Association of Private Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinics and Laboratories (Japan A-PART), Tokyo 160-0023, Japan.
K YanoJapan Association of Private Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinics and Laboratories (Japan A-PART), Tokyo 160-0023, Japan.
Y MichikuraJapan Association of Private Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinics and Laboratories (Japan A-PART), Tokyo 160-0023, Japan.
T HaraJapan Association of Private Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinics and Laboratories (Japan A-PART), Tokyo 160-0023, Japan.
K KyonoJapan Association of Private Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinics and Laboratories (Japan A-PART), Tokyo 160-0023, Japan.
K TakeuchiJapan Association of Private Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinics and Laboratories (Japan A-PART), Tokyo 160-0023, Japan.
T NakayamaJapan Association of Private Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinics and Laboratories (Japan A-PART), Tokyo 160-0023, Japan.
J IwamasaJapan Association of Private Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinics and Laboratories (Japan A-PART), Tokyo 160-0023, Japan.
Y MioJapan Association of Private Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinics and Laboratories (Japan A-PART), Tokyo 160-0023, Japan.
T KuramotoJapan Association of Private Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinics and Laboratories (Japan A-PART), Tokyo 160-0023, Japan.
Y NagataJapan Association of Private Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinics and Laboratories (Japan A-PART), Tokyo 160-0023, Japan.
T JoJapan Association of Private Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinics and Laboratories (Japan A-PART), Tokyo 160-0023, Japan.
Y AsadaJapan Association of Private Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinics and Laboratories (Japan A-PART), Tokyo 160-0023, Japan.
H OhishiJapan Association of Private Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinics and Laboratories (Japan A-PART), Tokyo 160-0023, Japan.
H OsadaKato Ladies Clinic, Tokyo 160-0023, Japan.
H YoshidaJapan Association of Private Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinics and Laboratories (Japan A-PART), Tokyo 160-0023, Japan.
Hamanomachi Hospital · JPHiroshima Prefectural Hospital · JPHyogo Prefectural Nishinomiya Hospital · JPJapan Hospital Association · JPMusashino Art University · JPOno Clinic · JPThe Nakamura Hajime Eastern Institute · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

study questionIs oocyte cryopreservation an applicable option for fertility preservation in unmarried patients with haematological malignancies? SUMMARY ANSWER: Oocyte cryopreservation via the vitrification method is accessible and may be considered an option for fertility preservation in unmarried patients with haematological malignancies. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Haematological malignancies are most commonly observed amongst adolescent and young adult women. Although the survival rate and life expectancy of those with haematological malignancies have improved, chemotherapy and radiotherapy may impair their reproductive potential. Oocyte cryopreservation is thus an ideal option to preserve their fertility. STUDY DESIGN SIZE DURATION: This study retrospectively evaluated 193 unmarried patients (age: 26.2 ± 0.4 years) with haematological malignancies, who consulted for oocyte cryopreservation across 20 different fertility centres in Japan between February 2007 and January 2015. The primary outcome measures were the oocyte retrievals and oocyte cryopreservation outcomes. The secondary outcome measures were the outcomes following oocyte warming for IVF. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS SETTING

methodsThe patients had commenced ovarian stimulation cycles via antagonist, agonist, natural and minimal methods for oocyte retrievals, defined according to the treatment strategy of each respective fertility centre. A vitrification method using the Cryotop safety kit was used for oocyte cryopreservation. ICSIs were used for insemination of warmed oocytes. The endometrial preparation method for embryo transfer was hormonal replacement therapy, except in the case of a patient who underwent a spontaneous ovulatory cycle. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Among 193 patients, acute myeloid leukaemia (n = 45, 23.3%) was most common, followed by acute lymphoid leukaemia (n = 38, 19.7%) and Hodgkin's lymphoma (n = 30, 15.5%). In total, 162 patients (83.9%) underwent oocyte retrieval, and oocytes were successfully cryopreserved for 155 patients (80.3%). The mean number of oocyte retrieval cycles and cryopreserved oocytes were 1.7 ± 0.2 and 6.3 ± 0.4, respectively. As of December 2019, 14 patients (9.2%) had requested oocyte warming for IVF. The survival rate of oocytes after vitrification-warming was 85.2% (75/88). The rates of fertilisation and embryo development were 80.0% (60/75) and 46.7% (28/60), respectively. Ten patients (71.4%) had successful embryo transfers, and seven live births (50.0%) were achieved. LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION: This study was limited by its retrospective nature. Additionally, there remains an insufficient number of cases regarding the warming of vitrified oocytes to reliably conclude whether oocyte cryopreservation is effective for patients with haematological malignancies. Further long-term follow-up study is required. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE

findingsOocyte retrieval and oocyte cryopreservation were accessible for patients with haematological malignancies; however, the number of oocyte retrievals may have been limited due to the initiation of cancer treatments. Acceptable embryonic and pregnancy outcomes could be achieved following oocyte warming; therefore, our results suggest that oocyte cryopreservation can be considered an option for fertility preservation in patients with haematological malignancies. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors. The authors declare no conflict of interest. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.

Indexed as

fertility preservationhaematological malignanciesoocyte cryopreservationpost-pubertal womenvitrification

Identifiers

PMID33501384
PMCPMC7810816
OpenAlexW3121341429

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.