Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33501362›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in robotics and AI2020

Genetic Fuzzy Based Scalable System of Distributed Robots for a Collaborative Task.

Anoop Sathyan, Kelly Cohen, Ou Ma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in robotics and AI, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Anoop SathyanDepartment of Aerospace Engineering, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, United States.
Kelly CohenDepartment of Aerospace Engineering, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, United States.
Ou MaDepartment of Aerospace Engineering, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper introduces a new genetic fuzzy based paradigm for developing scalable set of decentralized homogenous robots for a collaborative task. In this work, the number of robots in the team can be changed without any additional training. The dynamic problem considered in this work involves multiple stationary robots that are assigned with the goal of bringing a common effector, which is physically connected to each of these robots through cables, to any arbitrary target position within the workspace of the robots. The robots do not communicate with each other. This means that each robot has no explicit knowledge of the actions of the other robots in the team. At any instant, the robots only have information related to the common effector and the target. Genetic Fuzzy System (GFS) framework is used to train controllers for the robots to achieve the common goal. The same GFS model is shared among all robots. This way, we take advantage of the homogeneity of the robots to reduce the training parameters. This also provides the capability to scale to any team size without any additional training. This paper shows the effectiveness of this methodology by testing the system on an extensive set of cases involving teams with different number of robots. Although the robots are stationary, the GFS framework presented in this paper does not put any restriction on the placement of the robots. This paper describes the scalable GFS framework and its applicability across a wide set of cases involving a variety of team sizes and robot locations. We also show results in the case of moving targets.

Indexed as

cable robotcollaborative controldecentralized controlgenetic fuzzy systemintelligent systemsmachine learning

Identifiers

PMID33501362
PMCPMC7806041

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.