Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33501338›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in robotics and AI2020

A Brief Survey of Telerobotic Time Delay Mitigation.

Parinaz Farajiparvar, Hao Ying, Abhilash Pandya

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in robotics and AI, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. A Master-Follower Teleoperation System for Robotic Catheterisation: Design, Characterisation and Tracking Control.The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. WebRTC-based MOSR remote control of mobile manipulators.International journal of intelligent robotics and applications · 2023
    Article
  10. Towards Haptic-Based Dual-Arm Manipulation.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Parinaz FarajiparvarElectrical and Computer Engineering, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, United States.
Hao YingElectrical and Computer Engineering, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, United States.
Abhilash PandyaElectrical and Computer Engineering, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a substantial number of telerobotics and teleoperation applications ranging from space operations, ground/aerial robotics, drive-by-wire systems to medical interventions. Major obstacles for such applications include latency, channel corruptions, and bandwidth which limit teleoperation efficacy. This survey reviews the time delay problem in teleoperation systems. We briefly review different solutions from early approaches which consist of control-theory-based models and user interface designs and focus on newer approaches developed since 2014. Future solutions to the time delay problem will likely be hybrid solutions which include modeling of user intent, prediction of robot movements, and time delay prediction all potentially using time series prediction methods. Hence, we examine methods that are primarily based on time series prediction. Recent prediction approaches take advantage of advances in nonlinear statistical models as well as machine learning and neural network techniques. We review Recurrent Neural Networks, Long Short-Term Memory, Sequence to Sequence, and Generative Adversarial Network models and examine each of these approaches for addressing time delay. As time delay is still an unsolved problem, we suggest some possible future research directions from information-theory-based modeling, which may lead to promising new approaches to advancing the field.

Indexed as

Long Short-Term Memorymachine learningrecurrent neural networkRoboticsSequence to sequence modelteleoperationtelesurgerytime series prediction

Identifiers

PMID33501338
PMCPMC7805850

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.