ArticleFrontiers in robotics and AI2020
A Socially Adaptable Framework for Human-Robot Interaction.
Article in Frontiers in robotics and AI, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Social and emotional learning in artificial agents.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Human-Robot Interaction in Indoor Mobile Robotics: Current State, Interaction Modalities, Applications, and Future Challenges.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- A Multimodal Adaptive Framework for Social Interaction with the MiRo-E Robot.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Collaborating with a robot biases human spatial attention.iScience · 2025Article
- Child-Centric Robot Dialogue Systems: Fine-Tuning Large Language Models for Better Utterance Understanding and Interaction.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Artificial cognition vs. artificial intelligence for next-generation autonomous robotic agents.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2024Article
- Toward an idiomatic framework for cognitive robotics.Patterns (New York, N.Y.) · 2022Article
- Emotion Recognizing by a Robotic Solution Initiative (EMOTIVE Project).Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Characterization of Indicators for Adaptive Human-Swarm Teaming.Frontiers in robotics and AI · 2022Article
- You Were Always on My Mind: Introducing Chef's Hat and COPPER for Personalized Reinforcement Learning.Frontiers in robotics and AI · 2021Article
- The experience of older persons with mental health conditions who interact with healthcare robots and nurse intermediaries: The qualitative case studies.Belitung nursing journal · 2021Article
- General Framework for the Optimization of the Human-Robot Collaboration Decision-Making Process Through the Ability to Change Performance Metrics.Frontiers in robotics and AI · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In our everyday lives we regularly engage in complex, personalized, and adaptive interactions with our peers. To recreate the same kind of rich, human-like interactions, a social robot should be aware of our needs and affective states and continuously adapt its behavior to them. Our proposed solution is to have the robot learn how to select the behaviors that would maximize the pleasantness of the interaction for its peers. To make the robot autonomous in its decision making, this process could be guided by an internal motivation system. We wish to investigate how an adaptive robotic framework of this kind would function and personalize to different users. We also wish to explore whether the adaptability and personalization would bring any additional richness to the human-robot interaction (HRI), or whether it would instead bring uncertainty and unpredictability that would not be accepted by the robot's human peers. To this end, we designed a socially adaptive framework for the humanoid robot iCub. As a result, the robot perceives and reuses the affective and interactive signals from the person as input for the adaptation based on internal social motivation. We strive to investigate the value of the generated adaptation in our framework in the context of HRI. In particular, we compare how users will experience interaction with an adaptive versus a non-adaptive social robot. To address these questions, we propose a comparative interaction study with iCub whereby users act as the robot's caretaker, and iCub's social adaptation is guided by an internal comfort level that varies with the stimuli that iCub receives from its caretaker. We investigate and compare how iCub's internal dynamics would be perceived by people, both in a condition when iCub does not personalize its behavior to the person, and in a condition where it is instead adaptive. Finally, we establish the potential benefits that an adaptive framework could bring to the context of repeated interactions with a humanoid robot.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.