Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33501252›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in robotics and AI2020

A Survey on Probabilistic Models in Human Perception and Machines.

Lux Li, Robert Rehr, Patrick Bruns, Timo Gerkmann, Brigitte Röder

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in robotics and AI, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lux LiBiological Psychology and Neuropsychology, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Robert RehrSignal Processing (SP), Department of Informatics, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Patrick BrunsBiological Psychology and Neuropsychology, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Timo GerkmannSignal Processing (SP), Department of Informatics, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Brigitte RöderBiological Psychology and Neuropsychology, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Extracting information from noisy signals is of fundamental importance for both biological and artificial perceptual systems. To provide tractable solutions to this challenge, the fields of human perception and machine signal processing (SP) have developed powerful computational models, including Bayesian probabilistic models. However, little true integration between these fields exists in their applications of the probabilistic models for solving analogous problems, such as noise reduction, signal enhancement, and source separation. In this mini review, we briefly introduce and compare selective applications of probabilistic models in machine SP and human psychophysics. We focus on audio and audio-visual processing, using examples of speech enhancement, automatic speech recognition, audio-visual cue integration, source separation, and causal inference to illustrate the basic principles of the probabilistic approach. Our goal is to identify commonalities between probabilistic models addressing brain processes and those aiming at building intelligent machines. These commonalities could constitute the closest points for interdisciplinary convergence.

Indexed as

audiovisual integrationautomatic speech recognitioncausal inferencehuman psychophysicsmultisensory perceptionoptimal cue integrationsignal processingspeech enhancement

Identifiers

PMID33501252
PMCPMC7805657

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.