ArticleFrontiers in robotics and AI2019
Simulating Active Inference Processes by Message Passing.
Article in Frontiers in robotics and AI, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- The active construction of past episodes.Translational neuroscience · 2026Article
- FrAMBI: A Software Framework for Auditory Modeling Based on Bayesian Inference.Neuroinformatics · 2025Article
- Introducing ActiveInference.jl: A Julia Library for Simulation and Parameter Estimation with Active Inference Models.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Increasing the Construct Validity of Computational Phenotypes of Mental Illness Through Active Inference and Brain Imaging.Brain sciences · 2024Review
- Active Inference and Epistemic Value in Graphical Models.Frontiers in robotics and AI · 2022Article
- On Epistemics in Expected Free Energy for Linear Gaussian State Space Models.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Dynamic Expectation Maximization Algorithm for Estimation of Linear Systems with Colored Noise.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Bayesian mechanics of perceptual inference and motor control in the brain.Biological cybernetics · 2021Article
- Generative Models for Active Vision.Frontiers in neurorobotics · 2021Article
- Modules or Mean-Fields?Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Inferring What to Do (And What Not to).Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Learning Generative State Space Models for Active Inference.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The free energy principle (FEP) offers a variational calculus-based description for how biological agents persevere through interactions with their environment. Active inference (AI) is a corollary of the FEP, which states that biological agents act to fulfill prior beliefs about preferred future observations (target priors). Purposeful behavior then results from variational free energy minimization with respect to a generative model of the environment with included target priors. However, manual derivations for free energy minimizing algorithms on custom dynamic models can become tedious and error-prone. While probabilistic programming (PP) techniques enable automatic derivation of inference algorithms on free-form models, full automation of AI requires specialized tools for inference on dynamic models, together with the description of an experimental protocol that governs the interaction between the agent and its simulated environment. The contributions of the present paper are two-fold. Firstly, we illustrate how AI can be automated with the use of ForneyLab, a recent PP toolbox that specializes in variational inference on flexibly definable dynamic models. More specifically, we describe AI agents in a dynamic environment as probabilistic state space models (SSM) and perform inference for perception and control in these agents by message passing on a factor graph representation of the SSM. Secondly, we propose a formal experimental protocol for simulated AI. We exemplify how this protocol leads to goal-directed behavior for flexibly definable AI agents in two classical RL examples, namely the Bayesian thermostat and the mountain car parking problems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.