ArticleFrontiers in robotics and AI2018
High Classification Accuracy of a Motor Imagery Based Brain-Computer Interface for Stroke Rehabilitation Training.
Article in Frontiers in robotics and AI, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed.
- Motor priming to enhance the effect of physical therapy in people with spinal cord injury.The journal of spinal cord medicine · 2025Trial
- Application of Artificial Intelligence in the Prediction and Management of Stroke Rehabilitation.Cyborg and bionic systems (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Review
- Enhancing Deep-Learning Classification for Remote Motor Imagery Rehabilitation Using Multi-Subject Transfer Learning in IoT Environment.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- A bimodal deep learning network based on CNN for fine motor imagery.Cognitive neurodynamics · 2024Article
- EEG-based sensorimotor neurofeedback for motor neurorehabilitation in children and adults: A scoping review.Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2024Article
- EEG Motor Imagery Classification: Tangent Space with Gate-Generated Weight Classifier.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- The evolution of neuromodulation for chronic stroke: From neuroplasticity mechanisms to brain-computer interfaces.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2024Review
- Upper extremity training followed by lower extremity training with a brain-computer interface rehabilitation system.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2024Article
- Development and evaluation of a BCI-neurofeedback system with real-time EEG detection and electrical stimulation assistance during motor attempt for neurorehabilitation of children with cerebral palsy.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2024Article
- Brain-computer interface on wrist training with or without neurofeedback in subacute stroke: a study protocol for a double-blinded, randomized control pilot trial.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Article
- Scoping Review on Brain-Computer Interface-Controlled Electrical Stimulation Interventions for Upper Limb Rehabilitation in Adults: A Look at Participants, Interventions, and Technology.Physiotherapy Canada. Physiotherapie Canada · 2023Article
- A comprehensive review on motion trajectory reconstruction for EEG-based brain-computer interface.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Review
- BCI-activated electrical stimulation in children with perinatal stroke and hemiparesis: A pilot study.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2023Article
- Brain-computer interface treatment for gait rehabilitation in stroke patients.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Article
- Optimizing Motor Imagery Parameters for Robotic Arm Control by Brain-Computer Interface.Brain sciences · 2022Article
- Decoding EEG rhythms offline and online during motor imagery for standing and sitting based on a brain-computer interface.Frontiers in neuroinformatics · 2022Article
- Neuromechanical Biomarkers for Robotic Neurorehabilitation.Frontiers in neurorobotics · 2021Review
- Binary Semantic Classification Using Cortical Activation with Pavlovian-Conditioned Vestibular Responses in Healthy and Locked-In Individuals.Cerebral cortex communications · 2021Article
- Brain-Computer Interface Coupled to a Robotic Hand Orthosis for Stroke Patients' Neurorehabilitation: A Crossover Feasibility Study.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2021Article
- EEG Biomarkers Related With the Functional State of Stroke Patients.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Motor imagery (MI) based brain-computer interfaces (BCI) extract commands in real-time and can be used to control a cursor, a robot or functional electrical stimulation (FES) devices. The control of FES devices is especially interesting for stroke rehabilitation, when a patient can use motor imagery to stimulate specific muscles in real-time. However, damage to motor areas resulting from stroke or other causes might impair control of a motor imagery BCI for rehabilitation. The current work presents a comparative evaluation of the MI-based BCI control accuracy between stroke patients and healthy subjects. Five patients who had a stroke that affected the motor system participated in the current study, and were trained across 10-24 sessions lasting about 1 h each with the recoveriX system. The participants' EEG data were classified while they imagined left or right hand movements, and real-time feedback was provided on a monitor. If the correct imagination was detected, the FES was also activated to move the left or right hand. The grand average mean accuracy was 87.4% for all patients and sessions. All patients were able to achieve at least one session with a maximum accuracy above 96%. Both the mean accuracy and the maximum accuracy were surprisingly high and above results seen with healthy controls in prior studies. Importantly, the study showed that stroke patients can control a MI BCI system with high accuracy relative to healthy persons. This may occur because these patients are highly motivated to participate in a study to improve their motor functions. Participants often reported early in the training of motor improvements and this caused additional motivation. However, it also reflects the efficacy of combining motor imagination, seeing continuous bar feedback, and real hand movement that also activates the tactile and proprioceptive systems. Results also suggested that motor function could improve even if classification accuracy did not, and suggest other new questions to explore in future work. Future studies will also be done with a first-person view 3D avatar to provide improved feedback and thereby increase each patients' sense of engagement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.