ArticleFrontiers in robotics and AI2018
Now You See Me: Convolutional Neural Network Based Tracker for Dairy Cows.
Article in Frontiers in robotics and AI, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Practices and Applications of Convolutional Neural Network-Based Computer Vision Systems in Animal Farming: A Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Pooled it
- A Systematic Review on Commercially Available and Validated Sensor Technologies for Welfare Assessment of Dairy Cattle.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2021Pooled it
- Data-Driven Prediction of Ammonia and Methane Concentrations and Emissions in Dairy Barns Using Artificial Neural Networks.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Socializing AI: Integrating Social Network Analysis and Deep Learning for Precision Dairy Cow Monitoring-A Critical Review.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Review
- AI and Data Analytics in the Dairy Farms: A Scoping Review.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Review
- Article
- Cow detection and tracking system utilizing multi-feature tracking algorithm.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- A Literature Review of Modeling Approaches Applied to Data Collected in Automatic Milking Systems.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023Review
- Passive radio frequency identification and video tracking for the determination of location and movement of broilers.Poultry science · 2023Article
- Instance Segmentation with Mask R-CNN Applied to Loose-Housed Dairy Cows in a Multi-Camera Setting.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2020Article
- Review: Application and Prospective Discussion of Machine Learning for the Management of Dairy Farms.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To maintain dairy cattle health and welfare at commensurable levels, analysis of the behaviors occurring between cows should be performed. This type of behavioral analysis is highly dependent on reliable and robust tracking of individuals, for it to be viable and applicable on-site. In this article, we introduce a novel method for continuous tracking and data-marker based identification of individual cows based on convolutional neural networks (CNNs). The methodology for data acquisition and overall implementation of tracking/identification is described. The Region of Interest (ROI) for the recordings was limited to a waiting area with free entrances to four automatic milking stations and a total size of 6 × 18 meters. There were 252 Swedish Holstein cows during the time of study that had access to the waiting area at a conventional dairy barn with varying conditions and illumination. Three Axis M3006-V cameras placed in the ceiling at 3.6 meters height and providing top-down view were used for recordings. The total amount of video data collected was 4 months, containing 500 million frames. To evaluate the system two 1-h recordings were chosen. The exit time and gate-id found by the tracker for each cow were compared with the exit times produced by the gates. In total there were 26 tracks considered, and 23 were correctly tracked. Given those 26 starting points, the tracker was able to maintain the correct position in a total of 101.29 min or 225 s in average per starting point/individual cow. Experiments indicate that a cow could be tracked close to 4 min before failure cases emerge and that cows could be successfully tracked for over 20 min in mildly-crowded (< 10 cows) scenes. The proposed system is a crucial stepping stone toward a fully automated tool for continuous monitoring of cows and their interactions with other individuals and the farm-building environment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.