ArticleFrontiers in robotics and AI2018
An Adaptive and Hybrid End-Point/Joint Impedance Controller for Lower Limb Exoskeletons.
Article in Frontiers in robotics and AI, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of selectively assisting impaired subtasks of walking in chronic stroke survivors.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2020Trial
- Model predictive game control for personalized and targeted interactive assistance.Communications engineering · 2026Article
- Collaborative AI for precision neurorehabilitation: a roadmap.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2025Review
- ChMER: an exoskeleton robot with active body weight support walker based on compliant actuation for children with cerebral palsy.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
- Exoskeletons for the rehabilitation of temporomandibular disorders: a comprehensive review.Frontiers in robotics and AI · 2025Review
- Within- and between-therapist agreement on personalized parameters for robot-assisted gait therapy: the challenge of adjusting robotic assistance.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2023Article
- Automatic versus manual tuning of robot-assisted gait training in people with neurological disorders.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2020Article
- Evaluation of Motor Primitive-Based Adaptive Control for Lower Limb Exoskeletons.Frontiers in robotics and AI · 2020Article
- Processing Surface EMG Signals for Exoskeleton Motion Control.Frontiers in neurorobotics · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Assist-as-needed (AAN) algorithms for the control of lower extremity rehabilitation robots can promote active participation of patients during training while adapting to their individual performances and impairments. The implementation of such controllers requires the adaptation of a control parameter (often the robot impedance) based on a performance (or error) metric. The choice of how an adaptive impedance controller is formulated implies different challenges and possibilities for controlling the patient's leg movement. In this paper, we analyze the characteristics and limitations of controllers defined in two commonly used formulations: joint and end-point space, exploring especially the implementation of an AAN algorithm. We propose then, as a proof-of-concept, an AAN impedance controller that combines the strengths of working in both spaces: a hybrid joint/end-point impedance controller. This approach gives the possibility to adapt the end-point stiffness in magnitude and direction in order to provide a support that targets the kinematic deviations of the end-point with the appropriate force vector. This controller was implemented on a two-link rehabilitation robot for gait training-the Lokomat®Pro V5 (Hocoma AG, Switzerland) and tested on 5 able-bodied subjects and 1 subject with Spinal Cord Injury. Our experiments show that the hybrid controller is a feasible approach for exoskeleton devices and that it could exploit the benefits of the end-point controller in shaping a desired end-point stiffness and those of the joint controller to promote the correct angular changes in the trajectories of the joints. The adaptation algorithm is able to adapt the end-point stiffness based on the subject's performance in different gait phases, i.e., the robot can render a higher stiffness selectively in the direction and gait phases where the subjects perform with larger kinematic errors. The proposed approach can potentially be generalized to other robotic applications for rehabilitation or assistive purposes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.