ArticleFrontiers in robotics and AI2018
Fusion of Bilateral Lower-Limb Neuromechanical Signals Improves Prediction of Locomotor Activities.
Article in Frontiers in robotics and AI, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 80 citations in OpenAlex.
- Online Adaptation Framework Enables Personalization of Exoskeleton Assistance During Locomotion in Patients Affected by Stroke.IEEE transactions on robotics : a publication of the IEEE Robotics and Automation Society · 2025Article
- The Effect of Sensor Feature Inputs on Joint Angle Prediction across Simple Movements.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Multivariate CNN Model for Human Locomotion Activity Recognition with a Wearable Exoskeleton Robot.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Electromyography-Based Control of Lower Limb Prostheses: A Systematic Review.IEEE transactions on medical robotics and bionics · 2023Article
- Artificial Neural Network-Based Activities Classification, Gait Phase Estimation, and Prediction.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2023Article
- Low limb prostheses and complex human prosthetic interaction: A systematic literature review.Frontiers in robotics and AI · 2023Review
- Adaptive Lower Limb Pattern Recognition for Multi-Day Control.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Comparison of machine learning and deep learning-based methods for locomotion mode recognition using a single inertial measurement unit.Frontiers in neurorobotics · 2022Article
- Design of a Bio-Inspired Gait Phase Decoder Based on Temporal Convolution Network Architecture With Contralateral Surface Electromyography Toward Hip Prosthesis Control.Frontiers in neurorobotics · 2022Article
- The Role of Surface Electromyography in Data Fusion with Inertial Sensors to Enhance Locomotion Recognition and Prediction.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Myoelectric control of robotic lower limb prostheses: a review of electromyography interfaces, control paradigms, challenges and future directions.Journal of neural engineering · 2021Review
- Real-Time Gait Phase Estimation for Robotic Hip Exoskeleton Control During Multimodal Locomotion.IEEE robotics and automation letters · 2021Article
- Genetic Algorithm for Feature Selection in Lower Limb Pattern Recognition.Frontiers in robotics and AI · 2021Article
- Biomechanical Signals of Varied Modality and Location Contribute Differently to Recognition of Transient Locomotion.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Relying on more sense for enhancing lower limb prostheses control: a review.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2020Review
- Subject- and Environment-Based Sensor Variability for Wearable Lower-Limb Assistive Devices.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
- Deep generative models with data augmentation to learn robust representations of movement intention for powered leg prostheses.IEEE transactions on medical robotics and bionics · 2019Article
- Continuous locomotion mode classification using a robotic hip exoskeleton.Proceedings of the ... IEEE/RAS-EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics. IEEE/RAS-EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and BiomechatronicsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Wearable lower-limb assistive devices have the potential to dramatically improve the walking ability of millions of individuals with gait impairments. However, most control systems for these devices do not enable smooth transitions between locomotor activities because they cannot continuously predict the user's intended movements. Intent recognition is an alternative control strategy that uses patterns of signals detected before movement completion to predict future states. This strategy has already enabled amputees to walk and transition seamlessly and intuitively between activities (e.g., level ground, stairs, ramps) using control signals from mechanical sensors embedded in the prosthesis and muscles of their residual limb. Walking requires interlimb coordination because the leading and trailing legs have distinct biomechanical functions. For unilaterally-impaired individuals, these differences tend to be amplified because they develop asymmetric gait patterns; however, state-of-the-art intent recognition approaches have not been systematically applied to bilateral neuromechanical control signals. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of including contralateral side signals for control in an intent recognition framework. First, we conducted an offline analysis using signals from bilateral lower-limb electromyography (EMG) and joint and limb kinematics recorded from 10 able-bodied subjects as they freely transitioned between level ground, stairs, and ramps without an assistive device. We hypothesized that including information from the contralateral side would reduce classification errors. Compared to ipsilateral sensors only, bilateral sensor fusion significantly reduced error rates; moreover, only one additional sensor from the contralateral side was needed to achieve a significant reduction in error rates. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to systematically investigate using simultaneously recorded bilateral lower-limb neuromechanical signals for intent recognition. These results provide a device-agnostic benchmark for intent recognition with bilateral neuromechanical signals and suggest that bilateral sensor fusion can be a simple but effective modular strategy for enhancing the control of lower-limb assistive devices. Finally, we provide preliminary offline results from one above-knee amputee walking with a powered leg prosthesis as a proof-of-concept for the generalizability and benefit of using bilateral sensor fusion to control an assistive device for an impaired population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.