Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33500955›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in robotics and AI2018

Statistical Relational Learning With Unconventional String Models.

Mai H Vu, Ashkan Zehfroosh, Kristina Strother-Garcia, Michael Sebok, Jeffrey Heinz, Herbert G Tanner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in robotics and AI, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mai H VuDepartment of Linguistics and Cognitive Science, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, United States.
Ashkan ZehfrooshCooperative Robotics Lab, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, United States.
Kristina Strother-GarciaDepartment of Linguistics and Cognitive Science, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, United States.
Michael SebokCooperative Robotics Lab, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, United States.
Jeffrey HeinzDepartment of Linguistics and Institute of Advanced Computational Science, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, United States.
Herbert G TannerCooperative Robotics Lab, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, United States.

Funding

SCH: GEAR - Grounded Early Adaptive RehabilitationR01HD087133 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE · PI GALLOWAY, JAMES C., HEINZ, JEFFREY · 2015 to 2017
$1.5M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD087133
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper shows how methods from statistical relational learning can be used to address problems in grammatical inference using model-theoretic representations of strings. These model-theoretic representations are the basis of representing formal languages logically. Conventional representations include a binary relation for order and unary relations describing mutually exclusive properties of each position in the string. This paper presents experiments on the learning of formal languages, and their stochastic counterparts, with unconventional models, which relax the mutual exclusivity condition. Unconventional models are motivated by domain-specific knowledge. Comparison of conventional and unconventional word models shows that in the domains of phonology and robotic planning and control, Markov Logic Networks With unconventional models achieve better performance and less runtime with smaller networks than Markov Logic Networks With conventional models.

Indexed as

control and planningformal language theorygrammatical inferenceMarkov logic networksmodel theoryphonologyroboticsstatistical relational learning

Identifiers

PMID33500955
PMCPMC7805770

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.