ArticleFrontiers in robotics and AI2018
Effects of Robot Facial Characteristics and Gender in Persuasive Human-Robot Interaction.
Article in Frontiers in robotics and AI, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Trust in AI Agent: A Systematic Review of Facial Anthropomorphic Trustworthiness for Social Robot Design.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Pooled it
- Age and generational differences in anthropomorphism and trust in large language models.Frontiers in cognition · 2026Article
- Designing for gender, age & proficiency: an empirical study of the cognitive ergonomics of dual-task interference in industrial human-robot collaboration.Frontiers in neurorobotics · 2026Article
- Persuasion, pride and prejudice: factors associated with students' resistance to a social robot's incorrect mathematical solution.Frontiers in robotics and AI · 2026Article
- Do We View Robots as We Do Ourselves? Examining Robotic Face Processing Using EEG.Brain sciences · 2025Article
- Evaluating human perceptions of android robot facial expressions based on variations in instruction styles.Frontiers in robotics and AI · 2025Article
- Creating Expressive Social Robots That Convey Symbolic and Spontaneous Communication.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Facial Anthropomorphic Trustworthiness Scale for Social Robots: A Hybrid Approach.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Gendered Actions with a Genderless Robot: Gender Attribution to Humanoid Robots in Action.International journal of social robotics · 2023Article
- Don't touch that dial: Psychological reactance, transparency, and user acceptance of smart thermostat setting changes.PloS one · 2023Article
- Seeing eye to eye: trustworthy embodiment for task-based conversational agents.Frontiers in robotics and AI · 2023Article
- Research status of elderly-care robots and safe human-robot interaction methods.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Review
- Facing the FACS-Using AI to Evaluate and Control Facial Action Units in Humanoid Robot Face Development.Frontiers in robotics and AI · 2022Article
- Robot faces elicit responses intermediate to human faces and objects at face-sensitive ERP components.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Implementation and Evaluation of a Grip Behavior Model to Express Emotions for an Android Robot.Frontiers in robotics and AI · 2021Article
- Robotic Telemedicine for Mental Health: A Multimodal Approach to Improve Human-Robot Engagement.Frontiers in robotics and AI · 2021Article
- Robot Authority in Human-Robot Teaming: Effects of Human-Likeness and Physical Embodiment on Compliance.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Article
- Trusting Robocop: Gender-Based Effects on Trust of an Autonomous Robot.Frontiers in psychology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The growing interest in social robotics makes it relevant to examine the potential of robots as persuasive agents and, more specifically, to examine how robot characteristics influence the way people experience such interactions and comply with the persuasive attempts by robots. The purpose of this research is to identify how the (ostensible) gender and the facial characteristics of a robot influence the extent to which people trust it and the psychological reactance they experience from its persuasive attempts. This paper reports a laboratory study where SociBot™, a robot capable of displaying different faces and dynamic social cues, delivered persuasive messages to participants while playing a game. In-game choice behavior was logged, and trust and reactance toward the advisor were measured using questionnaires. Results show that a robotic advisor with upturned eyebrows and lips (features that people tend to trust more in humans) is more persuasive, evokes more trust, and less psychological reactance compared to one displaying eyebrows pointing down and lips curled downwards at the edges (facial characteristics typically not trusted in humans). Gender of the robot did not affect trust, but participants experienced higher psychological reactance when interacting with a robot of the opposite gender. Remarkably, mediation analysis showed that liking of the robot fully mediates the influence of facial characteristics on trusting beliefs and psychological reactance. Also, psychological reactance was a strong and reliable predictor of trusting beliefs but not of trusting behavior. These results suggest robots that are intended to influence human behavior should be designed to have facial characteristics we trust in humans and could be personalized to have the same gender as the user. Furthermore, personalization and adaptation techniques designed to make people like the robot more may help ensure they will also trust the robot.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.