Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33500899›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in robotics and AI2018

Embodied Evolution in Collective Robotics: A Review.

Nicolas Bredeche, Evert Haasdijk, Abraham Prieto

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in robotics and AI, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Signalling and social learning in swarms of robots.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Meta-control of social learning strategies.PLoS computational biology · 2022
    Article
  6. The emergence of collective knowledge and cumulative culture in animals, humans and machines.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Article
  7. Social learning in swarm robotics.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nicolas BredecheSorbonne Université, CNRS, Institute of Intelligent Systems and Robotics, ISIR, Paris, France.
Evert HaasdijkComputational Intelligence Group, Department of Computer Science, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Abraham PrietoIntegrated Group for Engineering Research, Universidade da Coruna, Ferrol, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article provides an overview of evolutionary robotics techniques applied to online distributed evolution for robot collectives, namely, embodied evolution. It provides a definition of embodied evolution as well as a thorough description of the underlying concepts and mechanisms. This article also presents a comprehensive summary of research published in the field since its inception around the year 2000, providing various perspectives to identify the major trends. In particular, we identify a shift from considering embodied evolution as a parallel search method within small robot collectives (fewer than 10 robots) to embodied evolution as an online distributed learning method for designing collective behaviors in swarm-like collectives. This article concludes with a discussion of applications and open questions, providing a milestone for past and an inspiration for future research.

Indexed as

collective adaptive systemscollective roboticsembodied evolutionevolutionary roboticsonline distributed evolution

Identifiers

PMID33500899
PMCPMC7806005

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.