ReviewAdvances in medical education and practice2021
Current Perspectives on Augmented Reality in Medical Education: Applications, Affordances and Limitations.
Review in Advances in medical education and practice, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Augmented reality for training on commonly missed extremity fractures: a study on the efficacy of technology-enhanced health professions education in learning outcomes and experience.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Augmented Reality in Health Education: Transforming Nursing, Healthcare, and Medical Education and Training.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2025Review
- Application of augmented reality technology for obstetrics and gynecology teaching among undergraduates.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Role of Augmented Reality in Tertiary Care: Qualitative Investigation Using Thematic Analysis.JMIR XR and spatial computing · 2025Article
- Looking Back on Digital Medical Education Over the Last 25 Years and Looking to the Future: Narrative Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Review
- Feasibility and Usability of Augmented Reality Technology in the Orthopaedic Operating Room.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2024Review
- Exploring the potential role for extended reality in Mohs micrographic surgery.Archives of dermatological research · 2024Review
- Augmented Reality in Neurosurgery: A New Paradigm for Training.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Review
- Recommendations for furthering diversity, innovation, and education in the society of abdominal radiology : Strengthening the society of abdominal radiology: diversity, innovation, and education.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2023Article
- Article
- Virtual reality and augmented reality in radiation oncology education - A review and expert commentary.Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology · 2022Article
- Integrated Digital Health Solutions in the Management of Growth Disorders in Pediatric Patients Receiving Growth Hormone Therapy: A Retrospective Analysis.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2022Article
- Digital 2D, 2.5D and 3D Methods for Adding Photo-Realistic Textures to 3D Facial Depictions of People from the Past.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2022Article
- Proposing a Framework Guide for the Integration of Educational Technologies and Innovations into the Teaching of Anatomy and Medical Sciences: The ASIC Framework.Advances in medical education and practice · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This systematic review has been developed against a background of rapid developments in augmented reality (AR) technology and its application in medical education. The objectives are to provide a critical synthesis of current trends in the field and to highlight areas for further research. The data sources used for the study were the PubMed, Web of Science and Discover databases. Sources included in the study comprised peer reviewed journal articles published between 2015 and 2020. Inclusion criteria included empirical research findings related to learning outcomes and the populations for the selected studies were medical students. Studies were appraised in terms of to what extent the use of AR contributed to learning gains in knowledge and/or skill. Twenty-one studies were included in the analysis, and the dates of these suggested an increasing trend of publications in this area. The uses of AR in each selected study were analyzed through a lens of affordance, to identify which specific affordances of AR appear to be most effective in this domain. Results of the study indicated that AR seems to be more effective in supporting skill development rather than knowledge gain when compared to other techniques. Some key affordances of AR in medical education are identified as developing practical skills in a spatial context, device portability across locations and situated learning in context. It is suggested that a focus on relevant affordances when designing AR systems for medical education may lead to better learning outcomes. It is noted that the majority of AR systems reported in the selected studies are concentrated in the areas of anatomy and surgery, but that are also other areas of practice being explored, and these may provide opportunities for new types of AR learning systems to be developed for medical education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.