ArticleInfection and drug resistance2021
Livestock-Associated and Non-Livestock-Associated
Article in Infection and drug resistance, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Inferring Staphylococcus aureus host species and cross-species transmission from a genome-based model.BMC genomics · 2025Article
- Prevalence of Methicillin-ResistantEpidemiologia (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- A review of new emerging livestock-associated methicillin-resistantVeterinary world · 2023Review
- A review of horses as a source of spreading livestock-associated methicillin-resistantVeterinary world · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe distinction between livestock-associated and human-associated methicillin-resistant
methodsA total of 591 pig-exposed workers and 1178 non-exposed workers were enrolled in this study. All nasal
resultsPig-exposed workers had significantly higher carriage rates of MRSA (OR=6.29, 95% CI: 3.38~11.68) and MDRSA (OR=3.17, 95% CI: 2.03~4.96) than non-exposed workers. Notably, we found dose-response relationships between occupational pig exposure and MRSA or MDRSA carriage. Using genotypic and phenotypic markers for differentiating livestock-associated and non-livestock-associated
conclusionOur findings provide sufficient epidemiological evidence for revealing the high transmission risk of livestock-associated
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.