ArticleGenetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics2021
Development and implementation of an electronic medical record module to track genetic testing results.
Article in Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Towards Electronic Medical Record (EMR) utilization in developing countries: a conceptual model based on systematic literature review.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Pooled it
- Clinical decision support with a comprehensive in-EHR patient tracking system improves genetic testing follow up.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeGenetic testing and results return pose many challenges, even in the era of electronic medical records. Whether results are positive or negative, genetic testing and return of results necessitate patient follow-up, referrals, and coordination between providers. Genetic evaluations typically utilize a variety of testing modalities with differing timetables and/or avenues to return. Therefore, genetic information requires a secondary, unified mechanism for storing and tracking results and communication to facilitate patient care.
methodsWe developed an electronic medical record (EMR) episodes-based module called Pediatric Genetic Tracking to provide a centralized summary of patient tracking information in a single-institution pediatric genetics setting.
resultsWe created episodes for 6,133 patients evaluated in our division over a 3-year period. They highlighted clinical information for 1,901 different diagnoses and 547 genetic tests, and the involvement of 9 providers, 7 genetic counselors, 61 trainees, and 15 students using two modes of follow-up.
conclusionThis Pediatric Genetic Tracking episodes system serves as a "one-stop shop" living document for updated patient genetic information and can be easily expanded to include variant content for broader population level sharing or analysis. These episodes-based modules facilitate communication to support timely and accurate return of genetic test results and follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33500566What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.