Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33500502›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Longitudinal touchscreen use across early development is associated with faster exogenous and reduced endogenous attention control.

Ana Maria Portugal, Rachael Bedford, Celeste H M Cheung, Luke Mason, Tim J Smith

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Computers in human behavior · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Mobile device use among preschool-aged children in Greece.Education and information technologies · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ana Maria PortugalPsychological Sciences, Centre for Brain and Cognitive Development, Birkbeck, University of London, London, UK.
Rachael BedfordBiostatistics and Health Informatics Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Celeste H M CheungPsychological Sciences, Centre for Brain and Cognitive Development, Birkbeck, University of London, London, UK.
Luke MasonPsychological Sciences, Centre for Brain and Cognitive Development, Birkbeck, University of London, London, UK.
Tim J SmithPsychological Sciences, Centre for Brain and Cognitive Development, Birkbeck, University of London, London, UK. tj.smith@bbk.ac.uk.

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Childhood screen time is associated with both attentional difficulties (for television viewing) and benefits (in action video gamers), but few studies have investigated today's pervasive touchscreen devices (e.g. smartphones and tablets), which combine salient features, interactive content, and accessibility from toddlerhood (a peak period of cognitive development). We tested exogenous and endogenous attention, following forty children who were stable high (HU) or low (LU) touchscreen users from toddlerhood to pre-school. HUs were slower to disengage attention, relative to their faster baseline orienting ability. In an infant anti-saccade task, HUs displayed more of a corrective strategy of orienting faster to distractors before anticipating the target. Results suggest that long-term high exposure to touchscreen devices is associated with faster exogenous attention and concomitant decreases in endogenous attention control. Future work is required to demonstrate causality, dissociate variants of use, and investigate how attention behaviours found in screen-based contexts translate to real-world settings.

Indexed as

Child DevelopmentScreen TimeAttentionChildFemaleHumansInfantLongitudinal StudiesMaleModels, BiologicalReaction TimeSaccadesTask Performance and Analysis

Identifiers

PMID33500502
PMCPMC7838402

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.