Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33500470›Full record

ReviewScientific reports2021

A review on imaging techniques and quantitative measurements for dynamic imaging of cerebral aneurysm pulsations.

L B Stam, R Aquarius, G A de Jong, C H Slump, F J A Meijer, H D Boogaarts

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

L B StamTechnical Medicine, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands. Lotte.stam@radboudumc.nl.
R AquariusDepartment of Neurosurgery, Radboud UMC, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
G A de JongDepartment of Neurosurgery, Radboud UMC, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
C H SlumpTechnical Medical Center, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
F J A MeijerDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboud UMC, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
H D BoogaartsDepartment of Neurosurgery, Radboud UMC, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Measurement of intracranial aneurysm wall motion may refine the current rupture risk estimation. A golden standard for measuring aneurysm pulsation is lacking. The aim is to evaluate magnitudes of aneurysm pulsation as published in current literature. Embase and PubMed were searched for publications containing quantitative measures of cardiac-cycle related cerebral aneurysm pulsation (no date or language restrictions). Eleven studies were included, covering 197 unruptured and untreated cerebral aneurysms. Quantitative pulsation measurements were extracted from the studies. Characteristics of the study population and aneurysms were taken into account, as well as the imaging modality, scanning technique and data processing methods used. A meta-analysis was performed of studies with similar methodologies and individual IA measures and locations. The magnitude of the absolute volume pulsations varied between 14 ± 9 mm

Indexed as

Diagnostic ImagingHumansIntracranial AneurysmOrgan Size

Identifiers

PMID33500470
PMCPMC7838168

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.