Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33500361›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2021

A New SARS-CoV-2 Dual-Purpose Serology Test: Highly Accurate Infection Tracing and Neutralizing Antibody Response Detection.

Sean C Taylor, Beth Hurst, Carmen L Charlton, Ashley Bailey, Jamil N Kanji, Mary K McCarthy, Thomas E Morrison, Leah Huey, Kyle Annen, Melkon G DomBourian and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 94 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
94citing papers in PubMed
9.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

94 citing papers in PubMed, 148 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

34 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Sean C TaylorGenScript USA Inc., Piscataway, New Jersey, USA sean.taylor@genscript.com.ORCID 0000-0003-3411-0673
Beth HurstCayman Chemical, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Carmen L CharltonPublic Health Laboratory, Alberta Precision Laboratories (ProvLab), University of Alberta Hospital, Edmonton, AB, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9129-5136
Ashley BaileyPublic Health Laboratory, Alberta Precision Laboratories (ProvLab), University of Alberta Hospital, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Jamil N KanjiPublic Health Laboratory, Alberta Precision Laboratories (ProvLab), University of Alberta Hospital, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Mary K McCarthyDepartment of Immunology and Microbiology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Thomas E MorrisonDepartment of Immunology and Microbiology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Leah HueyDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Kyle AnnenDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Melkon G DomBourianDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Vijaya KnightDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Children's Hospital Colorado · USUniversity of Alberta · CAUniversity of Colorado Denver · USAlberta Hospital Edmonton · CAAllscripts (United States) · USCayman Chemical (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) serology tests have proven to be less accurate than expected and do not assess antibody function as neutralizing, correlating with protection from reinfection. A new assay technology measuring the interaction of the purified SARS-CoV-2 spike protein receptor binding domain (RBD) with the extracellular domain of the human angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (hACE2) receptor detects these important antibodies. The cPass surrogate virus neutralization test (sVNT), compared directly with eight SARS-CoV-2 IgG serology and two live-cell neutralization tests, gives similar or improved accuracy for qualitative delineation between positive and negative individuals in a fast, scalable, and high-throughput assay. The combined data support the cPass sVNT as a tool for highly accurate SARS-CoV-2 immunity surveillance of infected/recovered and/or vaccinated individuals as well as drug and convalescent-phase donor screening. The data also preview a novel application for the cPass sVNT in calibrating the stringency of live-cell neutralization tests and its use in longitudinal testing of recovered and/or vaccinated patients.

Indexed as

Antibodies, NeutralizingCOVID-19Antibodies, ViralHumansSARS-CoV-2Spike Glycoprotein, CoronavirusAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralSpike Glycoprotein, Coronavirusspike protein, SARS-CoV-2ELISAneutralizing antibodiesSARS-CoV-2serologyvaccines

Identifiers

PMID33500361
PMCPMC8092720
OpenAlexW3121164647

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.