Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33500286›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

Co-designing organisational improvements and interventions to increase inpatient activity in four stroke units in England: a mixed-methods process evaluation using normalisation process theory.

David Clarke, Karolina Gombert-Waldron, Stephanie Honey, Geoffrey Cloud, Ruth Harris, Alastair Macdonald, Christopher McKevitt, Glenn Robert, Fiona Jones

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A scoping review of patient and public involvement in empirical stroke research.International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Physiotherapy Canada. Physiotherapie Canada · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

David ClarkeAcademic Unit for Ageing and Stroke Research, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds Faculty of Medicine and Health, Leeds, UK d.j.clarke@leeds.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-6279-1192
Karolina Gombert-WaldronFaculty of Health and Social Care Sciences, Kingston University and St George's, University of London, London, UK.
Stephanie HoneyLeeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Geoffrey CloudDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, CCS, Monash University Melbourne and Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Ruth HarrisFlorence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4377-5063
Alastair MacdonaldSchool of Design, The Glasgow School of Art, Glasgow, UK.
Christopher McKevittDepartment of Public Health Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Glenn RobertFlorence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8781-6675
Fiona JonesFaculty of Health Social Care and Education, St Georges University of London, London, UK.
King's College London · GBSt George's, University of London · GBUniversity of Leeds · GBAlfred Health · AUGlasgow School of Art · GB

Funding

Department of Health 13/114/95
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo explore facilitators and barriers to using experience-based co-design (EBCD) and accelerated EBCD (AEBCD) in the development and implementation of interventions to increase activity opportunities for inpatient stroke survivors.

designMixed-methods process evaluation underpinned by normalisation process theory (NPT).

settingFour post-acute rehabilitation stroke units in England.

participantsStroke survivors, family members, stroke unit staff, hospital managers, support staff and volunteers. Data informing our NPT analysis comprised: ethnographic observations, n=366 hours; semistructured interviews with 76 staff, 53 stroke survivors and 27 family members pre-EBCD/AEBCD implementation or post-EBCD/AEBCD implementation; and observation of 43 co-design meetings involving 23 stroke survivors, 21 family carers and 54 staff.

resultsFormer patients and families valued participation in EBCD/AEBCD perceiving they were equal partners in co-design. Staff engaged with EBCD/AEBCD, reporting it as a valuable improvement approach leading to increased activity opportunities. The structured EBCD/AEBCD approach was influential in enabling coherence and cognitive participation and legitimated staff involvement in the change process. Researcher facilitation of EBCD/AEBCD supported cognitive participation, collective action and reflexive monitoring; these were important in implementing and sustaining co-design activities. Observations and interviews post-EBCD/AEBCD cycles confirmed creation and use of new social spaces and increased activity opportunities in all units. EBCD/AEBCD facilitated engagement with wider hospital resources and local communities, further enhancing activity opportunities. However, outside of structured group activity, many individual staff-patient interactions remained task focused.

conclusionsEBCD/AEBCD facilitated the development and implementation of environmental changes and revisions to work routines which supported increased activity opportunities in stroke units providing post-acute and rehabilitation care. Former stroke patients and carers contributed to improvements. NPT's generative mechanisms were instrumental in analysis and interpretation of facilitators and barriers at the individual, group and organisational level, and can help inform future implementations of similar approaches.

Indexed as

InpatientsStrokeEnglandHealth PersonnelHumansQualitative Researchqualitative researchquality in healthcarerehabilitation medicinestroke

Identifiers

PMID33500286
PMCPMC7839845
OpenAlexW3126141375

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.