Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33499988›Full record

ReviewAnimal microbiome2021

The porcine respiratory microbiome: recent insights and future challenges.

Mattia Pirolo, Carmen Espinosa-Gongora, Debby Bogaert, Luca Guardabassi

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Animal microbiome, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Pulmonary lesions reshape swine respiratory microbiota: evidence of bacterial dysbiosis and reduced diversity.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Species Identification and Antimicrobial Resistance ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. SET-M33 peptide as a selectiveMicrobiology spectrum · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. iScience · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Correlation BetweenJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  19. EnterotoxigenicTransboundary and emerging diseases · 2025
    Article
  20. Use of Subtherapeutic Tylvalosin AgainstTransboundary and emerging diseases · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Mattia PiroloDepartment of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg, Denmark.
Carmen Espinosa-GongoraDepartment of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg, Denmark.
Debby BogaertCenter for Inflammation Research, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Luca GuardabassiDepartment of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg, Denmark. lg@sund.ku.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2389-5084
University of Copenhagen · DKCentre for Inflammation Research · GBRoma Tre University · IT

Funding

Chief Scientist Office SCAF/16/03
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding the structure of the respiratory microbiome and its complex interactions with opportunistic pathogenic bacteria has become a topic of great scientific and economic interest in livestock production, given the severe consequences of respiratory disease on animal health and welfare. The present review focuses on the microbial structures of the porcine upper and lower airways, and the factors that influence microbiome development and onset of respiratory disease. Following a literature search on PubMed and Scopus, 21 articles were selected based on defined exclusion criteria (20 studies performed by 16S rRNA gene sequencing and one by shotgun metagenomics). Analysis of the selected literature indicated that the microbial structure of the upper respiratory tract undergoes a remarkable evolution after birth and tends to stabilise around weaning. Antimicrobial treatment, gaseous ammonia concentration, diet and floor type are amongst the recognized environmental factors influencing microbiome structure. The predominant phyla of the upper respiratory tract are Proteobacteria and Firmicutes with significant differences at the genus level between the nasal and the oropharyngeal cavity. Only five studies investigated the lower respiratory tract and their results diverged in relation to the relative abundance of these two phyla and even more in the composition of the lung microbiome at the genus level, likely because of methodological differences. Reduced diversity and imbalanced microbial composition are associated with an increased risk of respiratory disease. However, most studies presented methodological pitfalls concerning specimen collection, sequencing target and depth, and lack of quality control. Standardization of sampling and sequencing procedures would contribute to a better understanding of the structure of the microbiota inhabiting the lower respiratory tract and its relationship with pig health and disease.

Indexed as

DiseaseHealthMicrobiotaPigPorcine respiratory disease complexRespiratory tract

Identifiers

PMID33499988
PMCPMC7934557
OpenAlexW3124288026

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.