ArticleAnimal microbiome2020
Multi-kingdom characterization of the core equine fecal microbiota based on multiple equine (sub)species.
Article in Animal microbiome, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
45 citing papers in PubMed.
- Gut Microbiota as a Molecular Regulator of Mineral Homeostasis in Horses: Mechanisms and Future Perspectives.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- A Comprehensive Review of the Equine Gut Microbiome in Health and Disease.Veterinary sciences · 2026Review
- Long-Read Sequencing for Species-Level Resolution of the Equine Gut Microbiota Reveals the Need for Improved Databases.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Multi-Kingdom Fecal Microbiota Alterations in Horses with Severe Equine Asthma.Microorganisms · 2026Article
- Dietary niches drive microbial community assembly, network reorganization, and symbiont evolution in freshwater fish gut microbiomes.The ISME journal · 2026Article
- A novel dataset of 2,362 equine fecal microbiomes from veterinary teaching hospitals across three countries reveals effects of geography and disease.Animal microbiome · 2025Article
- Dietary protein sources in concentrate supplementation influence growth performance by manipulating gut microbiota and serum metabolites in suckling Donkey foals.Animal microbiome · 2025Article
- Advances in Genomics and Postgenomics in Poultry Science: Current Achievements and Future Directions.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- The bacterial faecal microbiota shifts during the transition period in dairy cows.Animal microbiome · 2025Article
- Minimal disruption of equine gut microbiota by intravenous cephalothin treatment.The Journal of veterinary medical science · 2025Article
- Multiomic analysis of different horse breeds reveals that gut microbial butyrate enhances racehorse athletic performance.NPJ biofilms and microbiomes · 2025Article
- Variations in Intestinal Microbiota Among Three Species in the Cervidae Family Under the Same Feeding Conditions.Veterinary sciences · 2025Article
- Composition, Influencing Factors, and Effects on Host Nutrient Metabolism of Fungi in Gastrointestinal Tract of Monogastric Animals.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Review
- Correlation of hindgut microbiome and fermentation properties with a history of gas and/or impaction colic in Japanese draft horses.Journal of equine science · 2025Article
- Preliminary Functional Analysis of the Gut Microbiome in Colic Horses.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024Article
- Exploring the Effect of GastrointestinalAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024Review
- Faecal bacterial communities differ amongst discrete foraging populations of dugongs along the east Australian coast.FEMS microbiology ecology · 2024Article
- Article
- Investigating the potential immunomodulatory effects of commercial oral probiotic supplements on equine gastrointestinal tract barrier function.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Article
- Microbiome variations among age classes and diets of captive Asian elephants (Elephas maximus) in Thailand using full-length 16S rRNA nanopore sequencing.Scientific reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEquine gut microbiology studies to date have primarily focused on horses and ponies, which represent only one of the eight extant equine species. This is despite asses and mules comprising almost half of the world's domesticated equines, and donkeys being superior to horses/ponies in their ability to degrade dietary fiber. Limited attention has also been given to commensal anaerobic fungi and archaea even though anaerobic fungi are potent fiber degrading organisms, the activity of which is enhanced by methanogenic archaea. Therefore, the objective of this study was to broaden the current knowledge of bacterial, anaerobic fungal and archaeal diversity of the equine fecal microbiota to multiple species of equines. Core taxa shared by all the equine fecal samples (n = 70) were determined and an overview given of the microbiota across different equine types (horse, donkey, horse × donkey and zebra).
resultsEquine type was associated with differences in both fecal microbial concentrations and community composition. Donkey was generally most distinct from the other equine types, with horse and zebra not differing. Despite this, a common bacterial core of eight OTUs (out of 2070) and 16 genus level groupings (out of 231) was found in all the fecal samples. This bacterial core represented a much larger proportion of the equine fecal microbiota than previously reported, primarily due to the detection of predominant core taxa belonging to the phyla Kiritimatiellaeota (formerly Verrucomicrobia subdivision 5) and Spirochaetes. The majority of the core bacterial taxa lack cultured representation. Archaea and anaerobic fungi were present in all animals, however, no core taxon was detected for either despite several taxa being prevalent and predominant.
conclusionsWhilst differences were observed between equine types, a core fecal microbiota existed across all the equines. This core was composed primarily of a few predominant bacterial taxa, the majority of which are novel and lack cultured representation. The lack of microbial cultures representing the predominant taxa needs to be addressed, as their availability is essential to gain fundamental knowledge of the microbial functions that underpin the equine hindgut ecosystem.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.