Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33499975›Full record

ArticleAnimal microbiome2020

Breeding farm, level of feeding and presence of antibiotics in the feed influence rabbit cecal microbiota.

María Velasco-Galilea, Miriam Guivernau, Miriam Piles, Marc Viñas, Oriol Rafel, Armand Sánchez, Yuliaxis Ramayo-Caldas, Olga González-Rodríguez, Juan P Sánchez

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animal microbiome, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Antibiotic resistance spectrums ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2024
    Article
  3. Benefits of heat-killedFrontiers in veterinary science · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

María Velasco-GalileaInstitute of Agrifood Research and Technology (IRTA) - Animal Breeding and Genetics, E08140 Caldes de Montbui, Barcelona, Spain. maria.velasco@irta.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9533-7412
Miriam GuivernauInstitute of Agrifood Research and Technology (IRTA) - Integral Management of Organic Waste, E08140 Caldes de Montbui, Barcelona, Spain.
Miriam PilesInstitute of Agrifood Research and Technology (IRTA) - Animal Breeding and Genetics, E08140 Caldes de Montbui, Barcelona, Spain.
Marc ViñasInstitute of Agrifood Research and Technology (IRTA) - Integral Management of Organic Waste, E08140 Caldes de Montbui, Barcelona, Spain.
Oriol RafelInstitute of Agrifood Research and Technology (IRTA) - Animal Breeding and Genetics, E08140 Caldes de Montbui, Barcelona, Spain.
Armand SánchezAnimal Genomics Group, Centre for Research in Agricultural Genomics (CRAG) CSIC-IRTA-UAB-UB, Campus UAB, Catalonia, Spain.
Yuliaxis Ramayo-CaldasInstitute of Agrifood Research and Technology (IRTA) - Animal Breeding and Genetics, E08140 Caldes de Montbui, Barcelona, Spain.
Olga González-RodríguezInstitute of Agrifood Research and Technology (IRTA) - Animal Breeding and Genetics, E08140 Caldes de Montbui, Barcelona, Spain.
Juan P SánchezInstitute of Agrifood Research and Technology (IRTA) - Animal Breeding and Genetics, E08140 Caldes de Montbui, Barcelona, Spain.
Institute of Agrifood Research and Technology · ESUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ES

Funding

H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions 6655919Horizon 2020 Framework Programme 633531Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria RTA2011-00064-00-00Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria RTA2014-00015-C2-01Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria RTI2018-097610R-I00
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe effect of the production environment and different management practices in rabbit cecal microbiota remains poorly understood. While previous studies have proved the impact of the age or the feed composition, research in the breeding farm and other animal management aspects, such as the presence of antibiotics in the feed or the level of feeding, is still needed. Characterization of microbial diversity and composition of growing rabbits raised under different conditions could help better understand the role these practices play in cecal microbial communities and how it may result in different animal performance.

resultsFour hundred twenty-five meat rabbits raised in two different facilities, fed under two feeding regimes (ad libitum or restricted) with feed supplemented or free of antibiotics, were selected for this study. A 16S rRNA gene-based assessment through the MiSeq Illumina sequencing platform was performed on cecal samples collected from these individuals at slaughter. Different univariate and multivariate approaches were conducted to unravel the influence of the different factors on microbial alpha diversity and composition at phylum, genus and OTU taxonomic levels. The animals raised in the facility harboring the most stable environmental conditions had greater, and less variable, microbial richness and diversity. Bootstrap univariate analyses of variance and sparse partial least squares-discriminant analyses endorsed that farm conditions exerted an important influence on rabbit microbiota since the relative abundances of many taxa were found differentially represented between both facilities at all taxonomic levels characterized. Furthermore, only five OTUs were needed to achieve a perfect classification of samples according to the facility where animals were raised. The level of feeding and the presence of antibiotics did not modify the global alpha diversity but had an impact on some bacteria relative abundances, albeit in a small number of taxa compared with farm, which is consistent with the lower sample classification power according to these factors achieved using microbial information.

conclusionsThis study reveals that factors associated with the farm effect and other management factors, such as the presence of antibiotics in the diet or the feeding level, modify cecal microbial communities. It highlights the importance of offering a controlled breeding environment that reduces differences in microbial cecal composition that could be responsible for different animal performance.

Indexed as

16S MiSeq Illumina sequencingAnalysis of varianceAntibioticsBreeding farmCecal microbiotaFeed restrictionMeat rabbitMultivariate approach

Identifiers

PMID33499975
PMCPMC7807820
OpenAlexW3096316623

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.