Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33499961›Full record

ArticleAnimal microbiome2019

Temporal stability of the rumen microbiota in beef cattle, and response to diet and supplements.

Timothy J Snelling, Marc D Auffret, Carol-Anne Duthie, Robert D Stewart, Mick Watson, Richard J Dewhurst, Rainer Roehe, Alan W Walker

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animal microbiome, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Rumen Microbiome Reveals the Differential Response of COAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Timothy J SnellingRowett Institute, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZD, UK. tim.snelling@yahoo.co.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8952-8826
Marc D AuffretSRUC, Kings Buildings, Edinburgh, EH9 3JG, UK.
Carol-Anne DuthieSRUC, Kings Buildings, Edinburgh, EH9 3JG, UK.
Robert D StewartThe Roslin Institute and R(D)SVS, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH25 9RG, UK.
Mick WatsonThe Roslin Institute and R(D)SVS, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH25 9RG, UK.
Richard J DewhurstSRUC, Kings Buildings, Edinburgh, EH9 3JG, UK.
Rainer RoeheSRUC, Kings Buildings, Edinburgh, EH9 3JG, UK.
Alan W WalkerRowett Institute, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZD, UK. alan.walker@abdn.ac.uk.
Scotland's Rural College · GBRoslin Institute · GBUniversity of Aberdeen · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/K001744/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDietary intake is known to be a driver of microbial community dynamics in ruminants. Beef cattle go through a finishing phase that typically includes very high concentrate ratios in their feed, with consequent effects on rumen metabolism including methane production. This longitudinal study was designed to measure dynamics of the rumen microbial community in response to the introduction of high concentrate diets fed to beef cattle during the finishing period. A cohort of 50 beef steers were fed either of two basal diet formulations consisting of approximately 10:90 or 50:50 forage:concentrate ratios respectively. Nitrate and oil rich supplements were also added either individually or in combination. Digesta samples were taken at time points over ~ 200 days during the finishing period of the cattle to measure the adaptation to the basal diet and long-term stability of the rumen microbiota.

results16S rRNA gene amplicon libraries were prepared from 313 rumen digesta samples and analysed at a depth of 20,000 sequences per library. Bray Curtis dissimilarity with analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) revealed highly significant (p < 0.001) differences in microbiota composition between cattle fed different basal diets, largely driven by reduction of fibre degrading microbial groups and increased relative abundance of an unclassified Gammaproteobacteria OTU in the high concentrate fed animals. Conversely, the forage-based diet was significantly associated with methanogenic archaea. Within basal diet groups, addition of the nitrate and combined supplements had lesser, although still significant, impacts on microbiota dissimilarity compared to pre-treatment time points and controls. Measurements of the response and stability of the microbial community over the time course of the experiment showed continuing adaptation up to 25 days in the high concentrate groups. After this time point, however, no significant variability was detected.

conclusionsHigh concentrate diets that are typically fed to finishing beef cattle can have a significant effect on the microbial community in the rumen. Inferred metabolic activity of the different microbial communities associated with each of the respective basal diets explained differences in methane and short chain fatty acid production between cattle. Longitudinal sampling revealed that once adapted to a change in diet, the rumen microbial community remains in a relatively stable alternate state.

Indexed as

Concentrate dietForage dietMicrobiotaNitrate supplementationOil supplementationRumenTemporal stability

Identifiers

PMID33499961
PMCPMC7807515
OpenAlexW2990123853

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.