ArticleAnimal microbiome2020
The fecal microbiota of wild and captive raptors.
Article in Animal microbiome, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
35 citing papers in PubMed, 69 citations in OpenAlex.
- Rectal Bacteria and Antibiotic Resistance in Zoo Animals in Algeria.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Early-life gut microbiota differentiation in sympatric wild raptors.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Ecological Diversity of Migratory Birds and Their Associated Bacterial Species in South Korea: A Preliminary Study Including Antimicrobial Resistance Profiles.Veterinary sciences · 2025Article
- Antimicrobial Resistance inAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- A Preliminary Investigation of the Gastrointestinal Bacterial Microbiomes of Barred Owls (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Seasonal variation in gut microbiota of migratory wild raptors: a case study in white-tailed eagles.Animal microbiome · 2025Article
- Metagenomic analyses of gut microbiome composition and function with age in a wild bird; little change, except increased transposase gene abundance.ISME communications · 2025Article
- Captivity Reduces Diversity and Shifts Composition of the Great Bustard (Ecology and evolution · 2025Article
- Tracheal and cloacal bacterial diversity of red listed Eastern Imperial Eagle (Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- Detection ofMicroorganisms · 2024Article
- Early-life factors shaping the gut microbiota of Common buzzard nestlings.Animal microbiome · 2024Article
- Antimicrobial Resistance and Virulence Potential of Bacterial Species from Captive Birds of Prey-Consequences of Falconry for Public Health.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024Review
- Article
- Gut bacterial communities in roadkill animals: A pioneering study of two species in the Amazon region in Ecuador.PloS one · 2024Article
- Article
- Metagenomic comparison of gut communities between wild and captive Himalayan griffons.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2024Article
- Geographical survey of the mycobiome and microbiome of Southern California glassy-winged sharpshooters.mSphere · 2023Article
- Bifidobacteria define gut microbiome profiles of golden lion tamarin (Leontopithecus rosalia) and marmoset (Callithrix sp.) metagenomic shotgun pools.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- The Impact of Physical Effort on the Gut Microbiota of Long-Distance Fliers.Microorganisms · 2023Article
- Captive Breeding and Trichomonas gallinae Alter the Oral Microbiome of Bonelli's Eagle Chicks.Microbial ecology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe microorganisms populating the gastro-intestinal tract of vertebrates, collectively known as "microbiota", play an essential role in digestion and are important in regulating the immune response. Whereas the intestinal microbiota in humans and model organisms has been studied for many years, much less is known about the microbiota populating the intestinal tract of wild animals.
resultsThe relatively large number of raptors admitted to the Tufts Wildlife Clinic on the Cummings School of Veterinary Medicine at Tufts University campus provided a unique opportunity to investigate the bacterial microbiota in these birds. Opportunistic collection of fecal samples from raptors of 7 different species in the orders Strigiformes, Accipitriformes, and Falconiformes with different medical histories generated a collection of 46 microbiota samples. Based on 16S amplicon sequencing of fecal DNA, large β-diversity values were observed. Many comparisons exceeded weighted UniFrac distances of 0.9. Microbiota diversity did not segregate with the taxonomy of the host; no significant difference between microbiota from Strigiformes and from Accipitriformes/Falconiformes were observed. In contrast, in a sample of 22 birds admitted for rehabilitation, a significant effect of captivity was found. The change in microbiota profile was driven by an expansion of the proportion of Actinobacteria. Based on a small number of raptors treated with anti-microbials, no significant effect of these treatments on microbiota α-diversity was observed.
conclusionsThe concept of "meta-organism conservation", i.e., conservation efforts focused on the host and its intestinal microbiome has recently been proposed. The observed effect of captivity on the fecal microbiota is relevant to understanding the response of wildlife to captivity and optimizing wildlife rehabilitation and conservation efforts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.