Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33499951›Full record

ReviewAnimal microbiome2019

The gut microbiome of horses: current research on equine enteral microbiota and future perspectives.

Anne Kauter, Lennard Epping, Torsten Semmler, Esther-Maria Antao, Dania Kannapin, Sabita D Stoeckle, Heidrun Gehlen, Antina Lübke-Becker, Sebastian Günther, Lothar H Wieler and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Animal microbiome, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 77 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
77citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

77 citing papers in PubMed, 140 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Applied and environmental microbiology · 2025
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

17 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Anne KauterAdvanced Light and Electron Microscopy (ZBS-4), Robert Koch Institute, Seestraße 10, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
Lennard EppingMicrobial Genomics (NG1), Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.
Torsten SemmlerMicrobial Genomics (NG1), Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.
Esther-Maria AntaoResearch Data Management (MF4), Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.
Dania KannapinEquine Clinic, Surgery and Radiology, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Sabita D StoeckleEquine Clinic, Surgery and Radiology, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Heidrun GehlenEquine Clinic, Surgery and Radiology, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Antina Lübke-BeckerInstitute of Microbiology and Epizootics, Centre for Infection Medicine, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Sebastian GüntherPharmaceutical Biology Institute of Pharmacy, Universität Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Lothar H WielerRobert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.
Birgit WaltherAdvanced Light and Electron Microscopy (ZBS-4), Robert Koch Institute, Seestraße 10, 13353, Berlin, Germany. waltherb@rki.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3112-5722
Robert Koch Institute · DEFreie Universität Berlin · DE

Funding

Federal Government Innovation Support by Landwirtschaftliche Rentenbank grant 838 056German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) 01KI1725FGerman Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) 01KI1727DGerman Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) Grant ID 03ZZ0804Bthe German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) 01KI1727F
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding the complex interactions of microbial communities including bacteria, archaea, parasites, viruses and fungi of the gastrointestinal tract (GIT) associated with states of either health or disease is still an expanding research field in both, human and veterinary medicine. GIT disorders and their consequences are among the most important diseases of domesticated Equidae, but current gaps of knowledge hinder adequate progress with respect to disease prevention and microbiome-based interventions. Current literature on enteral microbiomes mirrors a vast data and knowledge imbalance, with only few studies tackling archaea, viruses and eukaryotes compared with those addressing the bacterial components.Until recently, culture-dependent methods were used for the identification and description of compositional changes of enteral microorganisms, limiting the outcome to cultivatable bacteria only. Today, next generation sequencing technologies provide access to the entirety of genes (microbiome) associated with the microorganisms of the equine GIT including the mass of uncultured microbiota, or "microbial dark matter".This review illustrates methods commonly used for enteral microbiome analysis in horses and summarizes key findings reached for bacteria, viruses and fungi so far. Moreover, reasonable possibilities to combine different explorative techniques are described. As a future perspective, knowledge expansion concerning beneficial compositions of microorganisms within the equine GIT creates novel possibilities for early disorder diagnostics as well as innovative therapeutic approaches. In addition, analysis of shotgun metagenomic data enables tracking of certain microorganisms beyond species barriers: transmission events of bacteria including pathogens and opportunists harboring antibiotic resistance factors between different horses but also between humans and horses will reach new levels of depth concerning strain-level distinctions.

Indexed as

DiseaseGastrointestinal tractHealthHorseMicrobiomeMicrobiota

Identifiers

PMID33499951
PMCPMC7807895
OpenAlexW2983838233

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.